Added value of cell-free DNA over clinical and ultrasound information for diagnosing ovarian cancer

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10500952" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10500952 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/25:10500952

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=kIgDIap2f6" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=kIgDIap2f6</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.29314" target="_blank" >10.1002/uog.29314</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Added value of cell-free DNA over clinical and ultrasound information for diagnosing ovarian cancer

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective: We previously proposed two cell-free (cf) DNA-based scores (genome-wide Z-score and nucleosome score) as candidate non-invasive biomarkers to further improve the presurgical diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. We aimed to investigate the added value of these cfDNA-based scores in combination with the clinical and ultrasound predictors of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model to estimate the risk of ovarian malignancy. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 526 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were recruited consecutively in three oncology referral centers. All patients underwent a transvaginal ultrasound examination, and adnexal masses were described according to the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions. cfDNA was extracted from preoperative plasma samples and genome-wide Z-scores and nucleosome scores were calculated. Logistic regression models were fitted for ADNEX predictors alone and after inclusion of the cfDNA-based scores. We report likelihood ratios, area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and net benefit for thresholds between 5% and 40%, to assess the diagnostic performance of the models in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Results: The study included 272 benign, 86 borderline, 36 Stage-I invasive, 113 Stage-II-IV invasive, and 19 secondary metastatic tumors. The likelihood ratios for adding the cfDNA-based scores to the ADNEX model were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.001 for ADNEX without CA 125; P = 0.001 for ADNEX including CA 125). The accompanying increases in AUC were 0.013 when the cfDNA biomarkers were added to the ADNEX model without CA 125, and 0.003 when added to the ADNEX model including CA 125. Net benefit, sensitivity and specificity were similar for all models. The increase in net benefit at the recommended 10% threshold estimated risk of malignancy when adding the cfDNA-based scores was 0.0017 and 0.0020, respectively, for the ADNEX model without CA 125 and the ADNEX model with CA 125. According to these results, adding cfDNA markers would require at least 453 patients per additional true-positive test result at the 10% risk threshold. Conclusion: Although statistically significant, cfDNA-based biomarker scores have limited clinical utility in addition to established clinical and ultrasound-based ADNEX predictors for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. (C) 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Added value of cell-free DNA over clinical and ultrasound information for diagnosing ovarian cancer

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective: We previously proposed two cell-free (cf) DNA-based scores (genome-wide Z-score and nucleosome score) as candidate non-invasive biomarkers to further improve the presurgical diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. We aimed to investigate the added value of these cfDNA-based scores in combination with the clinical and ultrasound predictors of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model to estimate the risk of ovarian malignancy. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 526 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were recruited consecutively in three oncology referral centers. All patients underwent a transvaginal ultrasound examination, and adnexal masses were described according to the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions. cfDNA was extracted from preoperative plasma samples and genome-wide Z-scores and nucleosome scores were calculated. Logistic regression models were fitted for ADNEX predictors alone and after inclusion of the cfDNA-based scores. We report likelihood ratios, area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and net benefit for thresholds between 5% and 40%, to assess the diagnostic performance of the models in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Results: The study included 272 benign, 86 borderline, 36 Stage-I invasive, 113 Stage-II-IV invasive, and 19 secondary metastatic tumors. The likelihood ratios for adding the cfDNA-based scores to the ADNEX model were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.001 for ADNEX without CA 125; P = 0.001 for ADNEX including CA 125). The accompanying increases in AUC were 0.013 when the cfDNA biomarkers were added to the ADNEX model without CA 125, and 0.003 when added to the ADNEX model including CA 125. Net benefit, sensitivity and specificity were similar for all models. The increase in net benefit at the recommended 10% threshold estimated risk of malignancy when adding the cfDNA-based scores was 0.0017 and 0.0020, respectively, for the ADNEX model without CA 125 and the ADNEX model with CA 125. According to these results, adding cfDNA markers would require at least 453 patients per additional true-positive test result at the 10% risk threshold. Conclusion: Although statistically significant, cfDNA-based biomarker scores have limited clinical utility in addition to established clinical and ultrasound-based ADNEX predictors for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. (C) 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

ISSN

0960-7692

e-ISSN

1469-0705

Svazek periodika

66

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

518-526

Kód UT WoS článku

001553852900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105013754308