Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech national observational registry
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000033" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/16:N0000033 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11120/16:43911032
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000653" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000653</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000653" target="_blank" >10.5301/ejo.5000653</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech national observational registry
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery and implantation of a new accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: We evaluated the collected data of 48 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and Wichterle IOL (WIOL) implantation included in the Czech national observational registry. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for distance (CDVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for near (CNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity were evaluated 6 months after surgery. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean monocular UDVA was 0.074 +- 0.108 logMAR, the mean monocular CDVA was 0.047 +- 0.125 logMAR, the mean monocular UNVA was 0.328 +- 0.146 logMAR, the mean monocular DCNVA was 0.339 +- 0.131 logMAR, and the mean monocular CNVA was 0.139 +- 0.107 logMAR. A total of 24 patients (50%) had no problems with any light phenomena. A total of 18 patients were very satisfied (37.5%), 11 were satisfied (22.9%), 15 (31.2%) were rather satisfied, 4 (8.3%) were rather dissatisfied, and 0 were dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The WIOL-continuous focus polyfocal lens offers very good vision at far and intermediate distance comparable with other types of multifocal IOLs, and relatively good near vision, while the incidence of adverse side phenomena is relatively low.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech national observational registry
Popis výsledku anglicky
PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery and implantation of a new accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: We evaluated the collected data of 48 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and Wichterle IOL (WIOL) implantation included in the Czech national observational registry. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for distance (CDVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for near (CNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity were evaluated 6 months after surgery. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean monocular UDVA was 0.074 +- 0.108 logMAR, the mean monocular CDVA was 0.047 +- 0.125 logMAR, the mean monocular UNVA was 0.328 +- 0.146 logMAR, the mean monocular DCNVA was 0.339 +- 0.131 logMAR, and the mean monocular CNVA was 0.139 +- 0.107 logMAR. A total of 24 patients (50%) had no problems with any light phenomena. A total of 18 patients were very satisfied (37.5%), 11 were satisfied (22.9%), 15 (31.2%) were rather satisfied, 4 (8.3%) were rather dissatisfied, and 0 were dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The WIOL-continuous focus polyfocal lens offers very good vision at far and intermediate distance comparable with other types of multifocal IOLs, and relatively good near vision, while the incidence of adverse side phenomena is relatively low.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Journal of Ophthalmology
ISSN
1120-6721
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
26
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
IT - Italská republika
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
230-235
Kód UT WoS článku
000380812100021
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84963830966