Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F25%3A43928329" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/25:43928329 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11120/25:43928329 RIV/00216208:11150/25:10497110

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05" target="_blank" >10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

AIM: To compare the 12-month outcomes of visual performance and patient satisfaction of a higher-order aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a conventional monofocal IOL. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blinded study including 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL in one eye (ICB00 group) and the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL in the fellow eye (ZCB00 group). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuities (DCNVA) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, and reading text size were also evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire at the 6-month postoperative visit. RESULTS: Mean postoperative logMAR UDVA was 0.01+-0.12 and -0.02+-0.10 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.37). Mean logMAR UIVA was 0.32+-0.19 and 0.45+-0.16 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.010). Differences between groups in UNVA did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16). The intermediate reading acuity at 66 cm (P=0.02) and 80 cm (P=0.04) was significantly better in the ICB00 group. Postoperative contrast sensitivity results did not differ significantly between groups (P&gt;0.05). Patients reported high overall satisfaction, with 62% of patients using spectacles for reading in everyday life. CONCLUSION: The eyes of patients implanted with the enhanced monofocal IOL evaluated have significantly better visual acuity for intermediate distances with the same contrast sensitivity as a conventional monofocal IOL.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses

Popis výsledku anglicky

AIM: To compare the 12-month outcomes of visual performance and patient satisfaction of a higher-order aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a conventional monofocal IOL. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blinded study including 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL in one eye (ICB00 group) and the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL in the fellow eye (ZCB00 group). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuities (DCNVA) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, and reading text size were also evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire at the 6-month postoperative visit. RESULTS: Mean postoperative logMAR UDVA was 0.01+-0.12 and -0.02+-0.10 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.37). Mean logMAR UIVA was 0.32+-0.19 and 0.45+-0.16 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.010). Differences between groups in UNVA did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16). The intermediate reading acuity at 66 cm (P=0.02) and 80 cm (P=0.04) was significantly better in the ICB00 group. Postoperative contrast sensitivity results did not differ significantly between groups (P&gt;0.05). Patients reported high overall satisfaction, with 62% of patients using spectacles for reading in everyday life. CONCLUSION: The eyes of patients implanted with the enhanced monofocal IOL evaluated have significantly better visual acuity for intermediate distances with the same contrast sensitivity as a conventional monofocal IOL.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30207 - Ophthalmology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Ophthalmology

ISSN

2222-3959

e-ISSN

2227-4898

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CN - Čínská lidová republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

598-605

Kód UT WoS článku

001456356200005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105001142964