VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F22%3A43921579" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/22:43921579 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11120/22:43921579 RIV/00216208:11130/22:10427832

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381211013975" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381211013975</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17085381211013975" target="_blank" >10.1177/17085381211013975</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

BACKGROUND: One of the three commercially available cyanoacrylate venous glues used for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency is the VariClose(R) vein sealing system. Previous studies have documented a high rate of occlusion and minimal postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare occlusion rates and clinical outcomes of endovenous laser treatment with the VariClose(R) vein sealing system in the treatment of truncal vein insufficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective non-randomized single center study with prospectively collected data comparing endovenous laser treatment and VariClose(R) procedures between April 2018 and November 2019. RESULTS: VariClose(R) was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and endovenous laser treatment in 42 patients (51 veins). The occlusion rate at one, three, and six months were 96%, 85%, and 65% for VariClose(R) procedures and 100%, 100%, and 97% for endovenous laser treatment procedures (p = 0.01), respectively. Reduction of VCSS scores before treatment and at the last postoperative follow-up visit in the VariClose(R) group dropped by an average of 1.8 +- 1.6 and in the endovenous laser treatment by an average of 3.3 +- 2.9 (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser treatment as a treatment option for varicose veins as it has a higher recanalization rate.

Název v anglickém jazyce

VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

Popis výsledku anglicky

BACKGROUND: One of the three commercially available cyanoacrylate venous glues used for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency is the VariClose(R) vein sealing system. Previous studies have documented a high rate of occlusion and minimal postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare occlusion rates and clinical outcomes of endovenous laser treatment with the VariClose(R) vein sealing system in the treatment of truncal vein insufficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective non-randomized single center study with prospectively collected data comparing endovenous laser treatment and VariClose(R) procedures between April 2018 and November 2019. RESULTS: VariClose(R) was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and endovenous laser treatment in 42 patients (51 veins). The occlusion rate at one, three, and six months were 96%, 85%, and 65% for VariClose(R) procedures and 100%, 100%, and 97% for endovenous laser treatment procedures (p = 0.01), respectively. Reduction of VCSS scores before treatment and at the last postoperative follow-up visit in the VariClose(R) group dropped by an average of 1.8 +- 1.6 and in the endovenous laser treatment by an average of 3.3 +- 2.9 (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser treatment as a treatment option for varicose veins as it has a higher recanalization rate.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30212 - Surgery

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Vascular

ISSN

1708-5381

e-ISSN

1708-539X

Svazek periodika

30

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

542-547

Kód UT WoS článku

000653325100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85106311641