Comparison of cyanoacrylate agents VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM in the treatment of insufficient saphenous veins

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F23%3A43926244" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/23:43926244 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/23:10472591 RIV/00216208:11120/23:43926244

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.33678/cor.2023.054" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.33678/cor.2023.054</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33678/cor.2023.054" target="_blank" >10.33678/cor.2023.054</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of cyanoacrylate agents VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM in the treatment of insufficient saphenous veins

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the cyanoacrylate venous sealing systems VenaSealTM and VariClose(R) in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Methods: A single-centre retrospective analysis on patients treated between April 2018 and April 2022 with cyanoacrylate adhesives for lower limb superficial truncal vein insufficiency was performed. Results: The VariClose(R) system was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and the VenaSealTM system in 97 patients (125 veins). The median follow-up periods for patients treated with VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM systems were 267 (IQR 223) and 201 (IQR 280) days, respectively. At one year, recanalization occurred in 11 veins treated with the VariClose(R) system and 5 veins treated with the VenaSealTM system. The occlusion rates estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method at 30, 90, 180, and 360 days were 100%, 96%, 83%, and 42% for veins treated with the VariClose(R) system and 100%, 98%, 96%, and 91% for veins treated with the VenaSealTM system (p &lt;0.01). Conclusions: The VenaSealTM system had significantly better occlusion rates than the VariClose(R) system.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of cyanoacrylate agents VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM in the treatment of insufficient saphenous veins

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the cyanoacrylate venous sealing systems VenaSealTM and VariClose(R) in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Methods: A single-centre retrospective analysis on patients treated between April 2018 and April 2022 with cyanoacrylate adhesives for lower limb superficial truncal vein insufficiency was performed. Results: The VariClose(R) system was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and the VenaSealTM system in 97 patients (125 veins). The median follow-up periods for patients treated with VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM systems were 267 (IQR 223) and 201 (IQR 280) days, respectively. At one year, recanalization occurred in 11 veins treated with the VariClose(R) system and 5 veins treated with the VenaSealTM system. The occlusion rates estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method at 30, 90, 180, and 360 days were 100%, 96%, 83%, and 42% for veins treated with the VariClose(R) system and 100%, 98%, 96%, and 91% for veins treated with the VenaSealTM system (p &lt;0.01). Conclusions: The VenaSealTM system had significantly better occlusion rates than the VariClose(R) system.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cor et Vasa

ISSN

0010-8650

e-ISSN

1803-7712

Svazek periodika

65

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

729-734

Kód UT WoS článku

001153313700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85179405148