Ascending aortic replacement versus aortic root replacement in patients with type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F25%3A43927999" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/25:43927999 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11120/25:43927999

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447241303408" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447241303408</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17539447241303408" target="_blank" >10.1177/17539447241303408</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ascending aortic replacement versus aortic root replacement in patients with type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

BACKGROUND: Extensive surgical resection of the thoracic aorta in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is thought to reduce the risk of late aortic wall degeneration and the need for repeat aortic operations. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the early and late outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study. METHODS: The outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, that is dissection flap located at least in one of the Valsava segments, were herein evaluated. In-hospital mortality, neurological complications, dialysis as well as 10-year repeat proximal aortic operation, and mortality were the outcomes of this study. RESULTS: Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement was performed in 198 patients and aortic root replacement in 215 patients. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 +- 4.0 years, 19 patients underwent 22 repeat procedures on the aortic root and/or aortic valve. No operative death occurred after these reinterventions. The risk of proximal aortic reoperation was significantly lower in patients who underwent aortic root replacement (5.5% vs 12.9%, adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio (SHR) 0.085, 95% CI 0.022-0.329). Aortic root replacement was associated with higher rates of in-hospital (14.4% vs 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio 2.192, 95% CI 1.000-4.807) and 10-year mortality (44.5% vs 30.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.216, 95% CI 1.338-3.671). Postoperative neurological complications and dialysis rates were comparable in the study groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, its replacement was associated with a significantly lower rate of repeat proximal aortic operation of any type compared to supracoronary aortic replacement. Still, aortic root replacement seems to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04831073 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04831073).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ascending aortic replacement versus aortic root replacement in patients with type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root

Popis výsledku anglicky

BACKGROUND: Extensive surgical resection of the thoracic aorta in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is thought to reduce the risk of late aortic wall degeneration and the need for repeat aortic operations. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the early and late outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study. METHODS: The outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, that is dissection flap located at least in one of the Valsava segments, were herein evaluated. In-hospital mortality, neurological complications, dialysis as well as 10-year repeat proximal aortic operation, and mortality were the outcomes of this study. RESULTS: Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement was performed in 198 patients and aortic root replacement in 215 patients. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 +- 4.0 years, 19 patients underwent 22 repeat procedures on the aortic root and/or aortic valve. No operative death occurred after these reinterventions. The risk of proximal aortic reoperation was significantly lower in patients who underwent aortic root replacement (5.5% vs 12.9%, adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio (SHR) 0.085, 95% CI 0.022-0.329). Aortic root replacement was associated with higher rates of in-hospital (14.4% vs 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio 2.192, 95% CI 1.000-4.807) and 10-year mortality (44.5% vs 30.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.216, 95% CI 1.338-3.671). Postoperative neurological complications and dialysis rates were comparable in the study groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, its replacement was associated with a significantly lower rate of repeat proximal aortic operation of any type compared to supracoronary aortic replacement. Still, aortic root replacement seems to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04831073 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04831073).

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease

ISSN

1753-9447

e-ISSN

1753-9455

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

January

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

1-10

Kód UT WoS článku

001402268100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85216331080