Comparison of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Single Versus Bilateral Carotid Artery Disease and Factors Affecting Midterm Outcome

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F11%3A7177" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/11:7177 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/11:7177

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530157" target="_blank" >http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530157</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Single Versus Bilateral Carotid Artery Disease and Factors Affecting Midterm Outcome

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is the method of choice for carotid artery revascularization of patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy. In this study, we compared the midterm results of CAS in patients with unilateral versus bilateralcarotid artery disease. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective analysis of 1-year outcome of 273 consecutive patients in whom 342 CAS procedures were performed. The incidence of periprocedural transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) differed significantly (8% vs. 1%; p = 0.01) among patients with and without bilateral internal carotid disease, and a tendency to a lower occurrence of early adverse events (death, stroke, periprocedural TIA, periprocedural myocardial infarction) was subsequently shown (11% vs. 5%; p = 0.12). At 1-year follow-up, there was a high incidence of adverse events (death, stroke, periprocedural TIA, periprocedural myocardial infarction, restenosis) in patients with bilateral carotid artery disease (40% vs. 14%; p

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Single Versus Bilateral Carotid Artery Disease and Factors Affecting Midterm Outcome

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is the method of choice for carotid artery revascularization of patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy. In this study, we compared the midterm results of CAS in patients with unilateral versus bilateralcarotid artery disease. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective analysis of 1-year outcome of 273 consecutive patients in whom 342 CAS procedures were performed. The incidence of periprocedural transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) differed significantly (8% vs. 1%; p = 0.01) among patients with and without bilateral internal carotid disease, and a tendency to a lower occurrence of early adverse events (death, stroke, periprocedural TIA, periprocedural myocardial infarction) was subsequently shown (11% vs. 5%; p = 0.12). At 1-year follow-up, there was a high incidence of adverse events (death, stroke, periprocedural TIA, periprocedural myocardial infarction, restenosis) in patients with bilateral carotid artery disease (40% vs. 14%; p

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Annals of Vascular Surgery

ISSN

0890-5096

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

25

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

796-804

Kód UT WoS článku

000293269500011

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—