Multimodality imaging of carotid stenosis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F15%3A10316908" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/15:10316908 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/15:10316908

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1556056" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1556056</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1556056" target="_blank" >10.1055/s-0035-1556056</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Multimodality imaging of carotid stenosis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Four diagnostic modalities are used to image the following internal carotid artery: digital subtraction angiography (DSA), duplex ultrasound (DUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The aim of this article is to describe the potentials of these techniques and to discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Invasive DSA is still considered the gold standard and is an indivisible part of the carotid stenting procedure. DUS is an inexpensive but operator-dependent tool with limited visibility of the carotid artery course. Conversely, CTA and MRA allow assessment of the carotid artery from the aortic arch to intracranial parts. The disadvantages of CTA are radiation and iodine contrast medium administration. MRA is without radiation but contrast-enhanced MRA is more accurate than noncontrast MRA. The choice of methods depends on the clinical indications and the availability of methods in individual centers. However, the general approach to patient with suspected carotid artery stenosis is to first perform DUS and then other noninvasive methods such as CTA, MRA, or transcranial Doppler US. Copyright (C) 2015 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Multimodality imaging of carotid stenosis

Popis výsledku anglicky

Four diagnostic modalities are used to image the following internal carotid artery: digital subtraction angiography (DSA), duplex ultrasound (DUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The aim of this article is to describe the potentials of these techniques and to discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Invasive DSA is still considered the gold standard and is an indivisible part of the carotid stenting procedure. DUS is an inexpensive but operator-dependent tool with limited visibility of the carotid artery course. Conversely, CTA and MRA allow assessment of the carotid artery from the aortic arch to intracranial parts. The disadvantages of CTA are radiation and iodine contrast medium administration. MRA is without radiation but contrast-enhanced MRA is more accurate than noncontrast MRA. The choice of methods depends on the clinical indications and the availability of methods in individual centers. However, the general approach to patient with suspected carotid artery stenosis is to first perform DUS and then other noninvasive methods such as CTA, MRA, or transcranial Doppler US. Copyright (C) 2015 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Angiology

ISSN

1061-1711

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

179-184

Kód UT WoS článku

000383091500005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84941929233