Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F16%3A10327960" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/16:10327960 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11130/16:10327960
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P=.01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P=.13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P=.10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P=.07 vs digoxin), and flecainide amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P=.01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P=.06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols
Popis výsledku anglicky
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P=.01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P=.13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P=.10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P=.07 vs digoxin), and flecainide amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P=.01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P=.06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Heart Rhythm
ISSN
1547-5271
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
13
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
1913-1919
Kód UT WoS článku
000382307400028
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—