The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F23%3A10469294" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/23:10469294 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/23:10469294

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=W6KJEfA4GH" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=W6KJEfA4GH</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00729-w" target="_blank" >10.1186/s13102-023-00729-w</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Abdominal bracing is a maneuver widely used by rehabilitation specialists and sports trainers to improve spinal stability. This study aimed to investigate how lifting tasks with and without abdominal bracing affect the respiratory function of the diaphragm. Methods: M-mode ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragmatic motion combined with spirometry was performed on 31 healthy adults. Participants were asked to breathe continuously whilst lifting a load with spontaneous abdominal muscle contraction (natural loaded breathing) and abdominal bracing (AB loaded breathing). Results: Pearson&apos;s correlations revealed strong correlations between ultrasonography and spirometry measures (p &lt; 0.001) for all types of breathing: tidal breathing (r = 0.709, r 2 = 0.503), natural loaded breathing (r = 0.731, r 2 = 0.534) and AB loaded breathing (r = 0.795, r 2 = 0.632). Using paired-samples t-tests, the natural loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p &lt; 0.001) but not during expiration (p =.101). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes (L) at the end of inspiration and expiration (p &lt; 0.001), with no changes in total lung volume (p = 0.06). The AB loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p = 0.002) but not during expiration (p = 0.05). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes at the end of inspiration (p &lt; 0.001), expiration (p = 0.002), and total lung volumes (p = 0.019). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that abdominal bracing performed during a lifting task reduces lung volume despite an increase in diaphragmatic motion. Diaphragm excursions strongly correlate with lung volumes even under postural loading. Trial registration: The study was prospectively registered on 8 April 2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov with identification number NCT04841109.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The effect of abdominal bracing on respiration during a lifting task: a cross-sectional study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Abdominal bracing is a maneuver widely used by rehabilitation specialists and sports trainers to improve spinal stability. This study aimed to investigate how lifting tasks with and without abdominal bracing affect the respiratory function of the diaphragm. Methods: M-mode ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragmatic motion combined with spirometry was performed on 31 healthy adults. Participants were asked to breathe continuously whilst lifting a load with spontaneous abdominal muscle contraction (natural loaded breathing) and abdominal bracing (AB loaded breathing). Results: Pearson&apos;s correlations revealed strong correlations between ultrasonography and spirometry measures (p &lt; 0.001) for all types of breathing: tidal breathing (r = 0.709, r 2 = 0.503), natural loaded breathing (r = 0.731, r 2 = 0.534) and AB loaded breathing (r = 0.795, r 2 = 0.632). Using paired-samples t-tests, the natural loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p &lt; 0.001) but not during expiration (p =.101). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes (L) at the end of inspiration and expiration (p &lt; 0.001), with no changes in total lung volume (p = 0.06). The AB loaded breathing ultrasonography revealed more caudal diaphragm positions during inspiration (p = 0.002) but not during expiration (p = 0.05). Spirometry demonstrated lower lung volumes at the end of inspiration (p &lt; 0.001), expiration (p = 0.002), and total lung volumes (p = 0.019). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that abdominal bracing performed during a lifting task reduces lung volume despite an increase in diaphragmatic motion. Diaphragm excursions strongly correlate with lung volumes even under postural loading. Trial registration: The study was prospectively registered on 8 April 2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov with identification number NCT04841109.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

ISSN

2052-1847

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

112

Kód UT WoS článku

001189114400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85171386995