Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography in pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064211%3A_____%2F24%3AW0000024" target="_blank" >RIV/00064211:_____/24:W0000024 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00136694 RIV/00216208:11110/24:10483201 RIV/00064165:_____/24:10483201
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://oadoi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005341" target="_blank" >https://oadoi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005341</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005341" target="_blank" >10.1136/ijgc-2024-005341</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography in pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objectives To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography in pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer, to compare the outcomes for pelvic and para-aortic regions, and to detect macrometastases and micrometastases separately. Methods Patients were retrospectively included if they met the following inclusion criteria: pathologically verified cervical cancer; ultrasonography performed by one of four experienced sonographers; surgical lymph node staging, at least in the pelvic region-sentinel lymph node biopsy or systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy or debulking. The final pathological examination was the reference standard. Results 390 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2019. Pelvic node macrometastases (>= 2 mm) were confirmed in 54 patients (13.8%), and micrometastases (>= 0.2 mm and <2 mm) in another 21 patients (5.4%). Ultrasonography had sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 94.0%, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.831 to detect pelvic macrometastases, while sensitivity 53.3%, specificity 94.0%, and AUC 0.737 to detect both pelvic macrometastases and micrometastases (pN1). Ultrasonography failed to detect pelvic micrometastases, with sensitivity 19.2%, specificity 85.2%, and AUC 0.522. There was no significant impact of body mass index on diagnostic accuracy. Metastases in para-aortic nodes (macrometastases only) were confirmed in 16 of 71 patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Ultrasonography yielded sensitivity 56.3%, specificity 98.2%, and AUC 0.772 to identify para-aortic node macrometastases. Conclusion Ultrasonography performed by an experienced sonographer can be considered a sufficient diagnostic tool for pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer, showing similar diagnostic accuracy in detection of pelvic macrometastases as reported for other imaging methods (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT or diffusion-weighted imaging/MRI). It had low sensitivity for detection of small-volume macrometastases (largest diameter <5 mm) and micrometastases. The accuracy of para-aortic assessment was comparable to that for pelvic lymph nodes, and assessment of the para-aortic region should be an inseparable part of the examination protocol.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography in pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objectives To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography in pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer, to compare the outcomes for pelvic and para-aortic regions, and to detect macrometastases and micrometastases separately. Methods Patients were retrospectively included if they met the following inclusion criteria: pathologically verified cervical cancer; ultrasonography performed by one of four experienced sonographers; surgical lymph node staging, at least in the pelvic region-sentinel lymph node biopsy or systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy or debulking. The final pathological examination was the reference standard. Results 390 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2019. Pelvic node macrometastases (>= 2 mm) were confirmed in 54 patients (13.8%), and micrometastases (>= 0.2 mm and <2 mm) in another 21 patients (5.4%). Ultrasonography had sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 94.0%, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.831 to detect pelvic macrometastases, while sensitivity 53.3%, specificity 94.0%, and AUC 0.737 to detect both pelvic macrometastases and micrometastases (pN1). Ultrasonography failed to detect pelvic micrometastases, with sensitivity 19.2%, specificity 85.2%, and AUC 0.522. There was no significant impact of body mass index on diagnostic accuracy. Metastases in para-aortic nodes (macrometastases only) were confirmed in 16 of 71 patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Ultrasonography yielded sensitivity 56.3%, specificity 98.2%, and AUC 0.772 to identify para-aortic node macrometastases. Conclusion Ultrasonography performed by an experienced sonographer can be considered a sufficient diagnostic tool for pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer, showing similar diagnostic accuracy in detection of pelvic macrometastases as reported for other imaging methods (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT or diffusion-weighted imaging/MRI). It had low sensitivity for detection of small-volume macrometastases (largest diameter <5 mm) and micrometastases. The accuracy of para-aortic assessment was comparable to that for pelvic lymph nodes, and assessment of the para-aortic region should be an inseparable part of the examination protocol.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30204 - Oncology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NU21-03-00461" target="_blank" >NU21-03-00461: CANNES Cervical Cancer Lymph Node Staging: Prospektivní multicentrická zobrazovací studie srovnávající diagnostickou přesnost ultrazvukového vyšetření, MRI a PET/CT v předoperačním hodnocení lymfatických uzlin u pacientek s karcinomem děložního hrdla</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
ISSN
1048-891X
e-ISSN
1525-1438
Svazek periodika
34
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
985-992
Kód UT WoS článku
001265086900013
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—