Comparison of CPAP adherence in two European sleep centres Influence of different obstructive sleep apnoea management strategies
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F16%3A00070396" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/16:00070396 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11818-016-0057-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11818-016-0057-5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11818-016-0057-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11818-016-0057-5</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of CPAP adherence in two European sleep centres Influence of different obstructive sleep apnoea management strategies
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
There is a lack of comparative data on long-termadherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in different countries. This study compared data on long-term subjective and objective adherence to CPAP therapy from two sleep research centres, one in Berlin, Germany, the other in Tampere, Finland. The objective was to compare adherence to CPAP therapy in order to identify predictors of good CPAP adherence. Retrospective data from obstructive sleep apnoea(OSA)patients already undergoing CPAP therapy at sleep centres in Berlin and Tampere were collected. Data included subjective adherence (questionnaire), objective adherence (device data), patient demographics and clinical data. Potential selection bias of patients was carefully checked in both centres. After manual titration, there were significant differences in adherence between patients treated in Berlin (mean 6.14 +/- 0.23 h/night) vs. Tampere (mean 4.24 +/- 0.24 h/night; p < 0.001). Adherence to CPAP therapy was significantly better in patients with manual titration compared to automatic titration (p < 0.002). Patients tended to overestimate subjective adherence to CPAP. Hypertension has a significant influence on adherence. This study reports significant differences in long-term CPAP therapy adherence between two sleep research centres in different countries for the first time. The differences might result from different management of adverse effects, as well as from variation in the prevalence of comorbid hypertension, titration methods and other patient care procedures.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of CPAP adherence in two European sleep centres Influence of different obstructive sleep apnoea management strategies
Popis výsledku anglicky
There is a lack of comparative data on long-termadherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in different countries. This study compared data on long-term subjective and objective adherence to CPAP therapy from two sleep research centres, one in Berlin, Germany, the other in Tampere, Finland. The objective was to compare adherence to CPAP therapy in order to identify predictors of good CPAP adherence. Retrospective data from obstructive sleep apnoea(OSA)patients already undergoing CPAP therapy at sleep centres in Berlin and Tampere were collected. Data included subjective adherence (questionnaire), objective adherence (device data), patient demographics and clinical data. Potential selection bias of patients was carefully checked in both centres. After manual titration, there were significant differences in adherence between patients treated in Berlin (mean 6.14 +/- 0.23 h/night) vs. Tampere (mean 4.24 +/- 0.24 h/night; p < 0.001). Adherence to CPAP therapy was significantly better in patients with manual titration compared to automatic titration (p < 0.002). Patients tended to overestimate subjective adherence to CPAP. Hypertension has a significant influence on adherence. This study reports significant differences in long-term CPAP therapy adherence between two sleep research centres in different countries for the first time. The differences might result from different management of adverse effects, as well as from variation in the prevalence of comorbid hypertension, titration methods and other patient care procedures.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Somnologie
ISSN
1432-9123
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
106-112
Kód UT WoS článku
000463235700005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—