Experience with VariClose (R) vein sealing system in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F21%3A00075172" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/21:00075172 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064173:_____/22:43922422 RIV/00216208:11120/22:43922422 RIV/00216208:11130/22:10432784 RIV/00216224:14110/22:00125316

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02683555211051500" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02683555211051500</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555211051500" target="_blank" >10.1177/02683555211051500</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Experience with VariClose (R) vein sealing system in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess occlusion rates of saphenous veins treated with the VariClose vein sealing system. Methods: A retrospective analysis including a total of 64 patients from four centres from the Czech Republic. Occlusion was defined as a non-compressible vein with absence of flow with exception to the first 3 cm from the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction on duplex ultrasound. Results: In 64 patients a total of 79 veins were treated. Technical success of the procedure was achieved in 74 (94%) of cases. The mean follow-up was 5.5 months. The closure rates calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were 94%, 85%, 69% and 36%, respectively, and there were no significant differences between centers. The average difference in VCSS score before and after the procedure was 1.8. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated surprisingly worse occlusion rates than the current literature.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Experience with VariClose (R) vein sealing system in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess occlusion rates of saphenous veins treated with the VariClose vein sealing system. Methods: A retrospective analysis including a total of 64 patients from four centres from the Czech Republic. Occlusion was defined as a non-compressible vein with absence of flow with exception to the first 3 cm from the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction on duplex ultrasound. Results: In 64 patients a total of 79 veins were treated. Technical success of the procedure was achieved in 74 (94%) of cases. The mean follow-up was 5.5 months. The closure rates calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were 94%, 85%, 69% and 36%, respectively, and there were no significant differences between centers. The average difference in VCSS score before and after the procedure was 1.8. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated surprisingly worse occlusion rates than the current literature.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30212 - Surgery

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Phlebology

ISSN

0268-3555

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

105-111

Kód UT WoS článku

000709477600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—