Autologous Alternative Vein Grafts for Infrainguinal Bypass in the Absence of Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein: A Single-Center Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F24%3A00081608" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/24:00081608 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14110/24:00136298

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890509624000529?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890509624000529?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.067" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.067</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Autologous Alternative Vein Grafts for Infrainguinal Bypass in the Absence of Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein: A Single-Center Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Alternative autologous veins can be used as a conduit when adequate great saphenous vein is unavailable. We analyzed the results of our infrainguinal bypasses after adopting upper extremity veins in our practice. Methods: This is a single-center observational study involving all patients whose infrainguinal bypass involved the use of upper extremity veins between April 2019, when we began using arm veins, and February 2023. Results: During the study period, 49 bypasses were done in 48 patients; mean age 68.1 +/- 9.8; men 32 (66.7%); body mass index 28.0 +/- 4.8; indications for surgery: chronic limb threatening ischemia 41 (83.7%); acute limb ischemia 3 (6.1%); complications of previous prosthetic 3 (6.1%), or autologous 2 (4.1%) bypass grafts. Vein splicing was used in 43 (87.8%) bypasses with 3-segment grafts being the most common (26; 53.1%). There were 24 (49.0%) femorotibial, 11 (22.4%) femoropopliteal, 9 (18.4%) femoropedal, and 5 (10.2%) extension jump bypass procedures. Eighteen (36.7%) operations were redo surgeries. Twenty-one (42.9%) bypasses were formed using only arm veins. The median follow-up was 12.9 months (4.5e24.2). Two bypasses occluded during the first 30 postoperative days (2/49; 4.1%). Overall 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year primary patency rates were 93.7% +/- 3.5%, 84.8% +/- 5.9%, and 80.6% +/- 6.9%, and secondary patency (SP) rates were 95.8% +/- 2.9%, 89.2% +/- 5.3%, and 89.2% +/- 5.3%. One-segment grafts had better patencies than 2-, 3-, and 4-segment grafts (1-year SP 100% +/- 0% vs 87.6% +/- 6.0%). Two-year amputation-free survival was 86.8% +/- 6.5%; 2-year overall survival was 88.2% +/- 6.6%. Conclusions: Integration of arm vein grafts in infrainguinal bypass practice can be done safely with low incidences of perioperative graft failure. One-segment grafts had better patencies than spliced vein grafts. The achieved early patency and amputation-free survival rates strongly encourage their use. In the absence of a single -segment great saphenous vein, upper extremity vein grafts should be the preferred conduit choice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Autologous Alternative Vein Grafts for Infrainguinal Bypass in the Absence of Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein: A Single-Center Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Alternative autologous veins can be used as a conduit when adequate great saphenous vein is unavailable. We analyzed the results of our infrainguinal bypasses after adopting upper extremity veins in our practice. Methods: This is a single-center observational study involving all patients whose infrainguinal bypass involved the use of upper extremity veins between April 2019, when we began using arm veins, and February 2023. Results: During the study period, 49 bypasses were done in 48 patients; mean age 68.1 +/- 9.8; men 32 (66.7%); body mass index 28.0 +/- 4.8; indications for surgery: chronic limb threatening ischemia 41 (83.7%); acute limb ischemia 3 (6.1%); complications of previous prosthetic 3 (6.1%), or autologous 2 (4.1%) bypass grafts. Vein splicing was used in 43 (87.8%) bypasses with 3-segment grafts being the most common (26; 53.1%). There were 24 (49.0%) femorotibial, 11 (22.4%) femoropopliteal, 9 (18.4%) femoropedal, and 5 (10.2%) extension jump bypass procedures. Eighteen (36.7%) operations were redo surgeries. Twenty-one (42.9%) bypasses were formed using only arm veins. The median follow-up was 12.9 months (4.5e24.2). Two bypasses occluded during the first 30 postoperative days (2/49; 4.1%). Overall 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year primary patency rates were 93.7% +/- 3.5%, 84.8% +/- 5.9%, and 80.6% +/- 6.9%, and secondary patency (SP) rates were 95.8% +/- 2.9%, 89.2% +/- 5.3%, and 89.2% +/- 5.3%. One-segment grafts had better patencies than 2-, 3-, and 4-segment grafts (1-year SP 100% +/- 0% vs 87.6% +/- 6.0%). Two-year amputation-free survival was 86.8% +/- 6.5%; 2-year overall survival was 88.2% +/- 6.6%. Conclusions: Integration of arm vein grafts in infrainguinal bypass practice can be done safely with low incidences of perioperative graft failure. One-segment grafts had better patencies than spliced vein grafts. The achieved early patency and amputation-free survival rates strongly encourage their use. In the absence of a single -segment great saphenous vein, upper extremity vein grafts should be the preferred conduit choice.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30212 - Surgery

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY

ISSN

0890-5096

e-ISSN

1615-5947

Svazek periodika

103

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

JUN

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

133-140

Kód UT WoS článku

001217754800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—