Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Cyclonic stack flow measurement uncertainties and impact on annualised mass emission measurements

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00177016%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000140" target="_blank" >RIV/00177016:_____/19:N0000140 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://flomeko2019.lnec.pt/after_conference.html" target="_blank" >http://flomeko2019.lnec.pt/after_conference.html</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Cyclonic stack flow measurement uncertainties and impact on annualised mass emission measurements

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Measurements of emissions of air pollutants are typically performed in accordance with CEN standards, which are being referred to as Standard Reference Methods. To determine emissions of air pollutants, concentration and flow measurements need to be performed within the stack. Standard EN ISO 16911-1 is employed as the Standard Reference Method for flow measurements. We perform validation measurements for this method in narrow stacks with cyclonic flows. To traceably determine the uncertainty of cyclonic flow in realistic field conditions, we use a stack simulator. We use a traceably calibrated wind tunnel to provide the stack with a welldefined input flow. We perform velocity measurements with a traceably calibrated L-Pitot tube in a stack simulator with two configurations: one with a straight stack entrance, the other with an elbow just before the stack entrance. In both cases, we measure the velocity at planes at several hydraulic diameters downstream from the stack entrance, namely 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 diameters downstream of the stack entrance. We also characterize the velocity profile at the stack entrance. We show that in both configurations, the flow profile deviates significantly from fully developed turbulent pipe flow, even at 7 diameters downstream of the stack entrance. In case of cyclonic flow, the effect is more pronounced. Future work will focus on comparing the flow measurements with computational fluid dynamics modelling to gain further insight into the additional flow measurement uncertainty.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Cyclonic stack flow measurement uncertainties and impact on annualised mass emission measurements

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Measurements of emissions of air pollutants are typically performed in accordance with CEN standards, which are being referred to as Standard Reference Methods. To determine emissions of air pollutants, concentration and flow measurements need to be performed within the stack. Standard EN ISO 16911-1 is employed as the Standard Reference Method for flow measurements. We perform validation measurements for this method in narrow stacks with cyclonic flows. To traceably determine the uncertainty of cyclonic flow in realistic field conditions, we use a stack simulator. We use a traceably calibrated wind tunnel to provide the stack with a welldefined input flow. We perform velocity measurements with a traceably calibrated L-Pitot tube in a stack simulator with two configurations: one with a straight stack entrance, the other with an elbow just before the stack entrance. In both cases, we measure the velocity at planes at several hydraulic diameters downstream from the stack entrance, namely 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 diameters downstream of the stack entrance. We also characterize the velocity profile at the stack entrance. We show that in both configurations, the flow profile deviates significantly from fully developed turbulent pipe flow, even at 7 diameters downstream of the stack entrance. In case of cyclonic flow, the effect is more pronounced. Future work will focus on comparing the flow measurements with computational fluid dynamics modelling to gain further insight into the additional flow measurement uncertainty.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    O - Ostatní výsledky

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20701 - Environmental and geological engineering, geotechnics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/8B17009" target="_blank" >8B17009: Metrology for air pollutant emissions</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů