A comparison of different rubber dam systems on a dental simulator
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F14%3A10271739" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/14:10271739 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11150/14:10271739
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://orbis.lfhk.cuni.cz/Acta_Medica/2014/2014_15.pdf" target="_blank" >http://orbis.lfhk.cuni.cz/Acta_Medica/2014/2014_15.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A comparison of different rubber dam systems on a dental simulator
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that recently developed rubber dam systems (OptraDam(R) Plus and OptiDamTM) are faster and easier to handle, and that the quality of isolation is not decreased. The rubber dam systems were applied in standard conditions on a dental simulator in several model clinical situations. Times of preparation, application and removal were measured and the quality of isolation was evaluated. The median time of rubber dam placement was 51 s (Q1=38 s; Q3=79 s). The shortest median time of application was with OptiDamTM (42 s), followed by a conventional rubber dam (53 s), and finally the longest was with OptraDam(R) Plus (58 s). The median volume of fluid remaining in the isolated space after 5 minutes was 9.5 mL(Q1=8 mL; Q3=10 mL). The largest median volume of remaining water was with OptiDamTM (10 mL), followed by a conventional rubber dam (9.5 mL) and the least with OptraDam(R) Plus (8.5 mL). The afore-stated hypothesis about the advantages o
Název v anglickém jazyce
A comparison of different rubber dam systems on a dental simulator
Popis výsledku anglicky
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that recently developed rubber dam systems (OptraDam(R) Plus and OptiDamTM) are faster and easier to handle, and that the quality of isolation is not decreased. The rubber dam systems were applied in standard conditions on a dental simulator in several model clinical situations. Times of preparation, application and removal were measured and the quality of isolation was evaluated. The median time of rubber dam placement was 51 s (Q1=38 s; Q3=79 s). The shortest median time of application was with OptiDamTM (42 s), followed by a conventional rubber dam (53 s), and finally the longest was with OptraDam(R) Plus (58 s). The median volume of fluid remaining in the isolated space after 5 minutes was 9.5 mL(Q1=8 mL; Q3=10 mL). The largest median volume of remaining water was with OptiDamTM (10 mL), followed by a conventional rubber dam (9.5 mL) and the least with OptraDam(R) Plus (8.5 mL). The afore-stated hypothesis about the advantages o
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Medica (Hradec Králové)
ISSN
1211-4286
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
57
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
15-20
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—