A comparison of three rubber dam systems in vivo - A preliminary study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F15%3A10313700" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11150/15:10313700 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00179906:_____/15:10313700
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2015.86" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2015.86</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2015.86" target="_blank" >10.14712/18059694.2015.86</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A comparison of three rubber dam systems in vivo - A preliminary study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of this study was to compare the isolation systems OptraDam(R) Plus and OptiDamTM with the conventional rubber dam in terms of objective and subjective parameters. The isolation systems were applied during the dental treatment of the patients. The time of preparation, placement, presence and removal were measured and the quality of isolation was evaluated. The median time of rubber dam placement was 76 s (Q1=62 s; Q3=111.25 s). The application time of OptraDam(R) Plus was significantly longer compared to the other systems (P<0.001). The median volume of fluid remaining in the isolated space after 5 minutes was 4.9 mL (Q1=4 mL; Q3=5 mL). The differences between the systems with regards to isolation quality were not statistically significant. Themajority of the patients reported a higher level of comfort during the treatment with a rubber dam than without it. The attitude of patients was not affected by any of the observed factors. The ranking of the isolation systems according
Název v anglickém jazyce
A comparison of three rubber dam systems in vivo - A preliminary study
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of this study was to compare the isolation systems OptraDam(R) Plus and OptiDamTM with the conventional rubber dam in terms of objective and subjective parameters. The isolation systems were applied during the dental treatment of the patients. The time of preparation, placement, presence and removal were measured and the quality of isolation was evaluated. The median time of rubber dam placement was 76 s (Q1=62 s; Q3=111.25 s). The application time of OptraDam(R) Plus was significantly longer compared to the other systems (P<0.001). The median volume of fluid remaining in the isolated space after 5 minutes was 4.9 mL (Q1=4 mL; Q3=5 mL). The differences between the systems with regards to isolation quality were not statistically significant. Themajority of the patients reported a higher level of comfort during the treatment with a rubber dam than without it. The attitude of patients was not affected by any of the observed factors. The ranking of the isolation systems according
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Medica (Hradec Králové)
ISSN
1211-4286
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
58
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
15-20
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84953408330