Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The Longer, the Better: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use for >=90% Is Superior to 70%-89% in Achieving Tighter Glycemic Outcomes in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F25%3A10489650" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/25:10489650 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/44555601:13450/25:43899169 RIV/00216208:11110/25:10489650 RIV/00216208:11120/25:43927839 RIV/00216208:11130/25:10489650 a 6 dalších

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=eZGd_yIWFT" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=eZGd_yIWFT</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0472" target="_blank" >10.1089/dia.2024.0472</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The Longer, the Better: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use for >=90% Is Superior to 70%-89% in Achieving Tighter Glycemic Outcomes in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Objective: The recommended threshold for the time spent on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is established at 70%. However, glucose outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes (CwD) using CGM for a different proportion of time within this threshold have not been evaluated yet. The study aims to compare glycemic parameters among CwD who spent 70%-89% and &gt;=90% on CGM using the population-wide data from the Czech national pediatric diabetes registry ČENDA. Methods: CwD aged &lt;19 years who used real-time CGM &gt;70% of the time and did not change the type of therapy throughout the year 2023 were included and divided into two groups based on the time they spent on CGM-70%-89% versus &gt;=90%. HbA1c, times in standard glycemic ranges, mean glucose, and coefficient of variability (CV) were compared between the groups and by treatment modalities. Results: Data from 1977 CwD (1035 males and 942 females) were evaluated. Among them, 404 participants (20.4%) used CGM 70%-89% of the time, and 1573 participants (79.6%) &gt;=90% of the time. Compared with the 70-89% group, the &gt;=90% CGM users achieved significantly lower HbA1c levels (51 mmol/mol, 6.8% vs. 58 mmol/mol, 7.4%, P &lt; 0.001), higher time in range (72% vs. 60%, P &lt; 0.001), and lower mean glucose and CV (8.1 mmol/L, 146 mg/dL vs. 9.1 mmol/L, 164 mg/dL and 37% vs. 40%, respectively, both P &lt; 0.001). Analogous results were seen irrespective of the treatment modality. The differences persisted after propensity score adjustment. Conclusion: CGM use for &gt;=90% is associated with tighter glycemic control compared with 70%-89% use. Therefore, it is essential to motivate CwD to use CGM for the longest possible time and search for suitable options to overcome barriers in uninterrupted CGM monitoring.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The Longer, the Better: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use for >=90% Is Superior to 70%-89% in Achieving Tighter Glycemic Outcomes in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Objective: The recommended threshold for the time spent on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is established at 70%. However, glucose outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes (CwD) using CGM for a different proportion of time within this threshold have not been evaluated yet. The study aims to compare glycemic parameters among CwD who spent 70%-89% and &gt;=90% on CGM using the population-wide data from the Czech national pediatric diabetes registry ČENDA. Methods: CwD aged &lt;19 years who used real-time CGM &gt;70% of the time and did not change the type of therapy throughout the year 2023 were included and divided into two groups based on the time they spent on CGM-70%-89% versus &gt;=90%. HbA1c, times in standard glycemic ranges, mean glucose, and coefficient of variability (CV) were compared between the groups and by treatment modalities. Results: Data from 1977 CwD (1035 males and 942 females) were evaluated. Among them, 404 participants (20.4%) used CGM 70%-89% of the time, and 1573 participants (79.6%) &gt;=90% of the time. Compared with the 70-89% group, the &gt;=90% CGM users achieved significantly lower HbA1c levels (51 mmol/mol, 6.8% vs. 58 mmol/mol, 7.4%, P &lt; 0.001), higher time in range (72% vs. 60%, P &lt; 0.001), and lower mean glucose and CV (8.1 mmol/L, 146 mg/dL vs. 9.1 mmol/L, 164 mg/dL and 37% vs. 40%, respectively, both P &lt; 0.001). Analogous results were seen irrespective of the treatment modality. The differences persisted after propensity score adjustment. Conclusion: CGM use for &gt;=90% is associated with tighter glycemic control compared with 70%-89% use. Therefore, it is essential to motivate CwD to use CGM for the longest possible time and search for suitable options to overcome barriers in uninterrupted CGM monitoring.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30209 - Paediatrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Diabetes Technology &amp; Therapeutics

  • ISSN

    1520-9156

  • e-ISSN

    1557-8593

  • Svazek periodika

    27

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    301-307

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001390805300001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85215668137