Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: changing paradigm during 10 years in a high-volume centre
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10285562" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/14:10285562 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61383082:_____/14:#0000254
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2166-x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2166-x</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2166-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00701-014-2166-x</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: changing paradigm during 10 years in a high-volume centre
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We analysed the results of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis treatment at our institution over the last 10 years according to treatment modalities (carotid endarterectomy [CEA] vs carotid artery stenting [CAS]). Furthermore, we compared our resultsof treatment prior to the EVA-3S study being implemented into our practice (2003-2007) and after that (2008-2012). During the years 2003-2012, a total of 1,471 procedures were performed for ICA stenosis. CEA was done in 815 cases and CAS in 656 cases. The primary outcome was disabling stroke (mRS > 2) or myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days after treatment. Secondary outcomes were frequency of transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs), minor strokes (stroke without impaired activities of daily living [ADL]) and any other significant complication. Comparisons of the results before and after 2008 were performed. Major mortality and morbidity were divided according to treatment groups; reached 1.0 % in the CEA group and 3.0 % in the CAS grou
Název v anglickém jazyce
Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: changing paradigm during 10 years in a high-volume centre
Popis výsledku anglicky
We analysed the results of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis treatment at our institution over the last 10 years according to treatment modalities (carotid endarterectomy [CEA] vs carotid artery stenting [CAS]). Furthermore, we compared our resultsof treatment prior to the EVA-3S study being implemented into our practice (2003-2007) and after that (2008-2012). During the years 2003-2012, a total of 1,471 procedures were performed for ICA stenosis. CEA was done in 815 cases and CAS in 656 cases. The primary outcome was disabling stroke (mRS > 2) or myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days after treatment. Secondary outcomes were frequency of transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs), minor strokes (stroke without impaired activities of daily living [ADL]) and any other significant complication. Comparisons of the results before and after 2008 were performed. Major mortality and morbidity were divided according to treatment groups; reached 1.0 % in the CEA group and 3.0 % in the CAS grou
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NT13627" target="_blank" >NT13627: Přesnost CT angiografie, DSA, MRAg a DUS u stenóz krkavice v porovnání s histologickými nálezy.</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Neurochirurgica
ISSN
0001-6268
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
156
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
AT - Rakouská republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1705-1712
Kód UT WoS článku
000340602400011
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—