A Comparative Study of Tower of London Scoring Systems and Normative Data

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F17%3A10360743" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/17:10360743 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00843989:_____/17:E0106331 RIV/00064165:_____/17:10360743

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw111" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw111</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw111" target="_blank" >10.1093/arclin/acw111</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Comparative Study of Tower of London Scoring Systems and Normative Data

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective: Tower of London (ToL) is a planning ability task that includes multiple versions. The original ToL was developed by Shallice together with two scoring systems (ToL-SS). Another two ToL-SS were proposed by Anderson et al. and Krikorian et al. The purpose of this study is to provide normative data for four ToL-SS and explore the effects of demographic variables on ToL performance. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the discriminative validity of these ToL-SS in clinical samples. Method: Four groups were included in the study: a normative sample of healthy adults (HC; n = 298); patients with Parkinson&apos;s disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI; n = 52) and without cognitive impairment (PD-ND; n = 57); and patients with schizophrenia (SCH; n = 28). The effects of demographic variables on ToL-SS were examined in the HC group. Between-groups comparisons of ToL-SS were conducted using regression analysis with dummy codes. Results: All four ToL-SS were not significantly affected by age, whereas the effect of gender and education is not consistent. ToL-SS significantly (p &lt; .05) differentiate HC from PD-MCI and SCH. Cohen&apos;s effect size coefficients d range from 0.68 to 1.29. Internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach&apos;s a) of ToL-SS range from 0.33 to 0.60. Conclusions: Despite poor to questionable internal consistency of ToL-SS, the discriminative validity and clinical utility for assessing planning deficits in PD-MCI and SCH are high. This study provides normative standards for all four ToL-SS on an adult population for use in clinical practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Comparative Study of Tower of London Scoring Systems and Normative Data

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective: Tower of London (ToL) is a planning ability task that includes multiple versions. The original ToL was developed by Shallice together with two scoring systems (ToL-SS). Another two ToL-SS were proposed by Anderson et al. and Krikorian et al. The purpose of this study is to provide normative data for four ToL-SS and explore the effects of demographic variables on ToL performance. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the discriminative validity of these ToL-SS in clinical samples. Method: Four groups were included in the study: a normative sample of healthy adults (HC; n = 298); patients with Parkinson&apos;s disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI; n = 52) and without cognitive impairment (PD-ND; n = 57); and patients with schizophrenia (SCH; n = 28). The effects of demographic variables on ToL-SS were examined in the HC group. Between-groups comparisons of ToL-SS were conducted using regression analysis with dummy codes. Results: All four ToL-SS were not significantly affected by age, whereas the effect of gender and education is not consistent. ToL-SS significantly (p &lt; .05) differentiate HC from PD-MCI and SCH. Cohen&apos;s effect size coefficients d range from 0.68 to 1.29. Internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach&apos;s a) of ToL-SS range from 0.33 to 0.60. Conclusions: Despite poor to questionable internal consistency of ToL-SS, the discriminative validity and clinical utility for assessing planning deficits in PD-MCI and SCH are high. This study provides normative standards for all four ToL-SS on an adult population for use in clinical practice.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30215 - Psychiatry

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

ISSN

0887-6177

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

32

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

328-338

Kód UT WoS článku

000400890700008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85021353532