Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin vs. established biomarkers in critically ill patients with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F18%3A10374455" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/18:10374455 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00064165:_____/18:10374455

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0839" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0839</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0839" target="_blank" >10.1515/cclm-2017-0839</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin vs. established biomarkers in critically ill patients with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: Inflammatory biomarkers may aid to distinguish between systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) vs. sepsis. We tested the hypotheses that (1) presepsin, a novel biomarker, can distinguish between SIRS and sepsis, and (2) higher presepsin levels will be associated with increased severity of illness and (3) with 28-day mortality, outperforming traditional biomarkers. Methods: Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), presepsin, and lactate were analyzed in 60 consecutive patients (sepsis and SIRS, n = 30 per group) on day 1 (D1) to D3 (onset sepsis, or after cardiac surgery). The systemic organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was determined daily. Results: There was no difference in mortality in sepsis vs. SIRS (12/30 vs. 8/30). Patients with sepsis had higher SOFA score vs. patients with SIRS (11 +/- 4 vs. 8 +/- 5; p = 0.023), higher presepsin (AUC = 0.674; p &lt; 0.021), PCT (AUC = 0.791; p &lt; 0.001), CRP (AUC = 0.903; p &lt; 0.0001), but not lactate (AUC = 0.506; p = 0.941). Unlike other biomarkers, presepsin did not correlate with SOFA on D1. All biomarkers were associated with mortality on D1: presepsin (AUC = 0.734; p = 0.0006; best cutoff = 1843 pg/mL), PCT (AUC = 0.844; p &lt; 0.0001), CRP (AUC = 0.701; p = 0.0048), and lactate (AUC = 0.778; p &lt; 0.0001). Multiple regression analyses showed independent associations of CRP with diagnosis of sepsis, and CRP and lactate with mortality. Increased neutrophils (p = 0.002) and decreased lymphocytes (p = 0.007) and monocytes (p = 0.046) were also associated with mortality. Conclusions: Presepsin did not outperform traditional sepsis biomarkers in diagnosing sepsis from SIRS and in prognostication of mortality in critically ill patients. Presepsin may have a limited adjunct value for both diagnosis and an early risk stratification, performing independently of clinical illness severity.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin vs. established biomarkers in critically ill patients with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: Inflammatory biomarkers may aid to distinguish between systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) vs. sepsis. We tested the hypotheses that (1) presepsin, a novel biomarker, can distinguish between SIRS and sepsis, and (2) higher presepsin levels will be associated with increased severity of illness and (3) with 28-day mortality, outperforming traditional biomarkers. Methods: Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), presepsin, and lactate were analyzed in 60 consecutive patients (sepsis and SIRS, n = 30 per group) on day 1 (D1) to D3 (onset sepsis, or after cardiac surgery). The systemic organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was determined daily. Results: There was no difference in mortality in sepsis vs. SIRS (12/30 vs. 8/30). Patients with sepsis had higher SOFA score vs. patients with SIRS (11 +/- 4 vs. 8 +/- 5; p = 0.023), higher presepsin (AUC = 0.674; p &lt; 0.021), PCT (AUC = 0.791; p &lt; 0.001), CRP (AUC = 0.903; p &lt; 0.0001), but not lactate (AUC = 0.506; p = 0.941). Unlike other biomarkers, presepsin did not correlate with SOFA on D1. All biomarkers were associated with mortality on D1: presepsin (AUC = 0.734; p = 0.0006; best cutoff = 1843 pg/mL), PCT (AUC = 0.844; p &lt; 0.0001), CRP (AUC = 0.701; p = 0.0048), and lactate (AUC = 0.778; p &lt; 0.0001). Multiple regression analyses showed independent associations of CRP with diagnosis of sepsis, and CRP and lactate with mortality. Increased neutrophils (p = 0.002) and decreased lymphocytes (p = 0.007) and monocytes (p = 0.046) were also associated with mortality. Conclusions: Presepsin did not outperform traditional sepsis biomarkers in diagnosing sepsis from SIRS and in prognostication of mortality in critically ill patients. Presepsin may have a limited adjunct value for both diagnosis and an early risk stratification, performing independently of clinical illness severity.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10608 - Biochemistry and molecular biology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

  • ISSN

    1434-6621

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    56

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    DE - Spolková republika Německo

  • Počet stran výsledku

    11

  • Strana od-do

    658-668

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000426657400025

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85037861311