Labor analgesia in Czech Republic and Slovakia: a 2015 national survey
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F18%3A10377742" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/18:10377742 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00103443 RIV/00098892:_____/18:N0000136 RIV/00843989:_____/18:E0107179 RIV/00064203:_____/18:10377742 RIV/00064165:_____/18:10377742
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.001" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.001</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.001" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.001</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Labor analgesia in Czech Republic and Slovakia: a 2015 national survey
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: The purpose of this international survey was to describe the current practices and techniques of labor analgesia in the Czech Republic (CZE) and Slovakia (SVK). Methods: All Czech and Slovak departments that provide obstetric anesthesia were invited to participate in a one-month (November 2015) prospective study that monitored in detail all peripartum anesthetic procedures delivered by anesthesiologists. Participating centers recorded all data on-line in the CLADE-IS database (Masaryk University, CZE). Results: The response rate was 71% (70 of 95 departments in CZE, 35 of 54 centers in SVK). Participating centers represented 87.7% of all births in CZE and 66.4% of all births in SVK during the study period. Analgesia for labor, administered by anesthesiologists, was recorded in 12.5% of deliveries (CZE 12.1%, SVK 13.4%). Epidural analgesia was used in most of the cases (CZE 97.2%, SVK 99.1%) whereas spinal (CZE 1.4%, SVK 0.9%) or combined spinal-epidural (CZE 0.5%, SVK 0.0%) and intravenous remifentanil analgesia (CZE 2.4%, SVK 0.0%) were used infrequently. One fifth of the labors with analgesia administered by anesthesiologists (CZE 20.2%, SVK 20.5%) terminated in cesarean section. Conclusions: Although labor analgesia was available in all Czech and Slovak obstetric centers, only a small proportion of parturients received an effective method of labor pain relief (regional or intravenous analgesia). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Labor analgesia in Czech Republic and Slovakia: a 2015 national survey
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: The purpose of this international survey was to describe the current practices and techniques of labor analgesia in the Czech Republic (CZE) and Slovakia (SVK). Methods: All Czech and Slovak departments that provide obstetric anesthesia were invited to participate in a one-month (November 2015) prospective study that monitored in detail all peripartum anesthetic procedures delivered by anesthesiologists. Participating centers recorded all data on-line in the CLADE-IS database (Masaryk University, CZE). Results: The response rate was 71% (70 of 95 departments in CZE, 35 of 54 centers in SVK). Participating centers represented 87.7% of all births in CZE and 66.4% of all births in SVK during the study period. Analgesia for labor, administered by anesthesiologists, was recorded in 12.5% of deliveries (CZE 12.1%, SVK 13.4%). Epidural analgesia was used in most of the cases (CZE 97.2%, SVK 99.1%) whereas spinal (CZE 1.4%, SVK 0.9%) or combined spinal-epidural (CZE 0.5%, SVK 0.0%) and intravenous remifentanil analgesia (CZE 2.4%, SVK 0.0%) were used infrequently. One fifth of the labors with analgesia administered by anesthesiologists (CZE 20.2%, SVK 20.5%) terminated in cesarean section. Conclusions: Although labor analgesia was available in all Czech and Slovak obstetric centers, only a small proportion of parturients received an effective method of labor pain relief (regional or intravenous analgesia). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30223 - Anaesthesiology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
ISSN
0959-289X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
35
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
August
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
42-51
Kód UT WoS článku
000441853100007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85047205530