Primary drug-related crime in the Czech Republic from a geographical perspective: study of urban, suburban and rural differences

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F20%3A10421076" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/20:10421076 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/44555601:13510/20:43897627

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=uKk61gbC0C" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=uKk61gbC0C</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2020-0012" target="_blank" >10.2478/geosc-2020-0012</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Primary drug-related crime in the Czech Republic from a geographical perspective: study of urban, suburban and rural differences

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Illicit drug use and drug-related crime constitute a significant issue and create large economic and societal costs both at national and regional level. The aim of this article is to examine the differences in primary drug-related crime between urban, suburban and rural local police departments in Czechia. The primary drug-related crime rate in local police departments was constructed from the data collected in the national crime database and the geographical classification of these departments was taken from previous research. To analyze the differences among urban, suburban and rural departments, we used the general linear model. The models with measures that were not standardized for the number of inhabitants were all significant, while not all the models with standardized measures were significant. Overall primary drug-related crime, unauthorized production and other handling of illicit drugs and possession of illicit drugs models with standardized measures showed no significant differences between departments. The cultivation of plants model with standardized measure shows an increase in the predicted values of independent variables in suburban and rural departments compared to urban departments. Our research results show that local urban police departments are not related to higher rates of standardized primary drug-related crime, although there are differences in specific drug law offences. It suggests that drug-related issues are prevalent in all types of departments, however, the specific issues differ between them. Conclusions: The research showed that standardized primary drug-related crime rate in urban departments is not higher than in suburban or rural local police departments. Highlights for public administration, management and planning: Primary drug-related crime in local urban police departments is not higher than in suburban or rural ones (Prague as outlier was excluded from the analysis). Urban and suburban local police departments are not different in manufacturing and possession of precursors and involvement of foreign nationals in primary drug-related crime. This suggests that this specific type of primary drug-related crime is typical for suburban as well as urban local police departments, while in rural ones, primary drug-related crime is the domain of Czech nationals. Organized primary drug-related crime seems to be an urban phenomenon.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Primary drug-related crime in the Czech Republic from a geographical perspective: study of urban, suburban and rural differences

Popis výsledku anglicky

Illicit drug use and drug-related crime constitute a significant issue and create large economic and societal costs both at national and regional level. The aim of this article is to examine the differences in primary drug-related crime between urban, suburban and rural local police departments in Czechia. The primary drug-related crime rate in local police departments was constructed from the data collected in the national crime database and the geographical classification of these departments was taken from previous research. To analyze the differences among urban, suburban and rural departments, we used the general linear model. The models with measures that were not standardized for the number of inhabitants were all significant, while not all the models with standardized measures were significant. Overall primary drug-related crime, unauthorized production and other handling of illicit drugs and possession of illicit drugs models with standardized measures showed no significant differences between departments. The cultivation of plants model with standardized measure shows an increase in the predicted values of independent variables in suburban and rural departments compared to urban departments. Our research results show that local urban police departments are not related to higher rates of standardized primary drug-related crime, although there are differences in specific drug law offences. It suggests that drug-related issues are prevalent in all types of departments, however, the specific issues differ between them. Conclusions: The research showed that standardized primary drug-related crime rate in urban departments is not higher than in suburban or rural local police departments. Highlights for public administration, management and planning: Primary drug-related crime in local urban police departments is not higher than in suburban or rural ones (Prague as outlier was excluded from the analysis). Urban and suburban local police departments are not different in manufacturing and possession of precursors and involvement of foreign nationals in primary drug-related crime. This suggests that this specific type of primary drug-related crime is typical for suburban as well as urban local police departments, while in rural ones, primary drug-related crime is the domain of Czech nationals. Organized primary drug-related crime seems to be an urban phenomenon.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30312 - Substance abuse

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

GeoScape

ISSN

1802-1115

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

134-142

Kód UT WoS článku

000605437700005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—