How to treat patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F11%3A00002707" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/11:00002707 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq410" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq410</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq410" target="_blank" >10.1093/eurheartj/ehq410</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

How to treat patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Over 50% of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients suffer multi-vessel coronary artery disease, which is known to be associated with worse prognosis. Treatment strategies used in clinical practice vary from acute multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), through staged PCI procedures to a conservative approach with primary PCI of only the infarct-related artery (IRA) and subsequent medical therapy unless recurrent ischaemia occurs. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. This review paper summarizes the international experience and authors´ opinion on this clinically important question. Multi-vessel disease in STEMI is not a single entity and thus the treatment approach should be individualized. However, the following general rules can be proposed till future large randomized trials prove otherwise: (i) Single-vessel acute PCI should be the default strategy (to treat only the IRA during the acute phase of STEMI). (ii) Acute multi-vessel PCI can

Název v anglickém jazyce

How to treat patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Over 50% of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients suffer multi-vessel coronary artery disease, which is known to be associated with worse prognosis. Treatment strategies used in clinical practice vary from acute multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), through staged PCI procedures to a conservative approach with primary PCI of only the infarct-related artery (IRA) and subsequent medical therapy unless recurrent ischaemia occurs. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. This review paper summarizes the international experience and authors´ opinion on this clinically important question. Multi-vessel disease in STEMI is not a single entity and thus the treatment approach should be individualized. However, the following general rules can be proposed till future large randomized trials prove otherwise: (i) Single-vessel acute PCI should be the default strategy (to treat only the IRA during the acute phase of STEMI). (ii) Acute multi-vessel PCI can

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Heart Journal

ISSN

0195-668X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

32

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

396-403

Kód UT WoS článku

000287496500008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—