Effect of Radial Versus Femoral Access on Radiation Dose and the Importance of Procedural Volume A Substudy of the Multicenter Randomized RIVAL Trial

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F13%3A43907361" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/13:43907361 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Effect of Radial Versus Femoral Access on Radiation Dose and the Importance of Procedural Volume A Substudy of the Multicenter Randomized RIVAL Trial

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objectives The authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access. Background Small trials have shown an increase in the radiation dose with radial compared with femoral access, but many were performed during the operators' learning curve of radial access. Methods Patients were randomized to radial or femoral access, as a part of the RIVAL (RadIal Vs. femorAL) trial (N = 7,021). Fluoroscopy time was prospectively collected in 5740 patients and radiation dose quantified as airkerma in 1,445 patients and dose-area product (DAP) in 2,255 patients. Results Median fluoroscopy time was higher with radial versus femoral access (9.3 vs. 8.0 min, p < 0.001). Median air kerma was nominally higher with radial versus femoral access (1,046 vs. 930 mGy, respectively, p = 0.051). Median DAP was not different between radial and femoral access (52.8 Gy-cm(2) vs. 51.2 Gy.cm(2), p = 0.83). When results are stratified according to procedural volume, air kerma was increased onl

Název v anglickém jazyce

Effect of Radial Versus Femoral Access on Radiation Dose and the Importance of Procedural Volume A Substudy of the Multicenter Randomized RIVAL Trial

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objectives The authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access. Background Small trials have shown an increase in the radiation dose with radial compared with femoral access, but many were performed during the operators' learning curve of radial access. Methods Patients were randomized to radial or femoral access, as a part of the RIVAL (RadIal Vs. femorAL) trial (N = 7,021). Fluoroscopy time was prospectively collected in 5740 patients and radiation dose quantified as airkerma in 1,445 patients and dose-area product (DAP) in 2,255 patients. Results Median fluoroscopy time was higher with radial versus femoral access (9.3 vs. 8.0 min, p < 0.001). Median air kerma was nominally higher with radial versus femoral access (1,046 vs. 930 mGy, respectively, p = 0.051). Median DAP was not different between radial and femoral access (52.8 Gy-cm(2) vs. 51.2 Gy.cm(2), p = 0.83). When results are stratified according to procedural volume, air kerma was increased onl

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions

ISSN

1936-8798

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

258-266

Kód UT WoS článku

000317485300011

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—