The media and intellectuals' response to medical publications: the antidepressants' case

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F13%3A43907684" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/13:43907684 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00023752:_____/13:43914515

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-12-11" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-12-11</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-12-11" target="_blank" >10.1186/1744-859X-12-11</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The media and intellectuals' response to medical publications: the antidepressants' case

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

During the last decade, there was a debate concerning the true efficacy of antidepressants. Several papers were published in scientific journals, but many articles were also published in the lay press and the internet both by medical scientists and academics from other disciplines or representatives of societies or initiatives. The current paper analyzes the articles authored by three representative opinion makers: one academic in medicine, one academic in philosophical studies, and a representative ofan activists' group against the use of antidepressants. All three articles share similar gaps in knowledge and understanding of the scientific data and also are driven by an 'existential-like' ideology. In our opinion, these articles have misinterpretedthe scientific data, and they as such may misinform or mislead the general public and policy makers, which could have a potential impact upon public health. It seems that this line of thought represents another aspect of the stigma attach

Název v anglickém jazyce

The media and intellectuals' response to medical publications: the antidepressants' case

Popis výsledku anglicky

During the last decade, there was a debate concerning the true efficacy of antidepressants. Several papers were published in scientific journals, but many articles were also published in the lay press and the internet both by medical scientists and academics from other disciplines or representatives of societies or initiatives. The current paper analyzes the articles authored by three representative opinion makers: one academic in medicine, one academic in philosophical studies, and a representative ofan activists' group against the use of antidepressants. All three articles share similar gaps in knowledge and understanding of the scientific data and also are driven by an 'existential-like' ideology. In our opinion, these articles have misinterpretedthe scientific data, and they as such may misinform or mislead the general public and policy makers, which could have a potential impact upon public health. It seems that this line of thought represents another aspect of the stigma attach

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FL - Psychiatrie, sexuologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Annals of General Psychiatry

ISSN

1744-859X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

12

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Art. Nr. 11

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

1-9

Kód UT WoS článku

000322182900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—