An osteoporosis course as a separate component of problem-based learning

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F25%3A43929034" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/25:43929034 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11130/25:10505308

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336915" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336915</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336915" target="_blank" >10.1371/journal.pone.0336915</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

An osteoporosis course as a separate component of problem-based learning

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

STUDY GROUPS AND METHODS: Study group I was comprised of 25 fourth-year students who successfully completed the Elective Osteoporosis Course I (focused on pathophysiology, diagnostics, and pharmacological treatment), while control group I was comprised of 25 fifth-year students who successfully completed only all required fourth- and fifth-year courses, but did not participate in the elective Osteoporosis I course. Study group II was comprised of 27 fourth-year students who successfully completed the Elective Osteoporosis Course II (focused on treatment of osteoporotic fractures), while control group II was comprised of 24 sixth-year students who were preparing for final exams in surgical disciplines, but did not participate in the Elective Osteoporosis Course II. The groups were compared using a linear regression model with robust estimation of standard errors using Stata 13.1. A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Study Group I scored, on average, 6.7 points higher than Control Group I on the multiple-choice test (scale -16 to +21). Study Group II scored, on average, 3.5 points higher than Control Group II on the multiple-choice test (scale -21 to +28). Both differences were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001, R2 = 0.64, 95% CI: 5.2-8.1; p = 0.006, R2 = 0.15, 95% CI: 1.1-5.9; respectively). CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated a greater understanding in students who participated in problem-based learning medical studies relative to those who completed only the mandatory curriculum.

Název v anglickém jazyce

An osteoporosis course as a separate component of problem-based learning

Popis výsledku anglicky

STUDY GROUPS AND METHODS: Study group I was comprised of 25 fourth-year students who successfully completed the Elective Osteoporosis Course I (focused on pathophysiology, diagnostics, and pharmacological treatment), while control group I was comprised of 25 fifth-year students who successfully completed only all required fourth- and fifth-year courses, but did not participate in the elective Osteoporosis I course. Study group II was comprised of 27 fourth-year students who successfully completed the Elective Osteoporosis Course II (focused on treatment of osteoporotic fractures), while control group II was comprised of 24 sixth-year students who were preparing for final exams in surgical disciplines, but did not participate in the Elective Osteoporosis Course II. The groups were compared using a linear regression model with robust estimation of standard errors using Stata 13.1. A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Study Group I scored, on average, 6.7 points higher than Control Group I on the multiple-choice test (scale -16 to +21). Study Group II scored, on average, 3.5 points higher than Control Group II on the multiple-choice test (scale -21 to +28). Both differences were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001, R2 = 0.64, 95% CI: 5.2-8.1; p = 0.006, R2 = 0.15, 95% CI: 1.1-5.9; respectively). CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated a greater understanding in students who participated in problem-based learning medical studies relative to those who completed only the mandatory curriculum.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30211 - Orthopaedics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

PLoS One

ISSN

1932-6203

e-ISSN

1932-6203

Svazek periodika

20

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

e0336915

Kód UT WoS článku

001626468700030

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105021845073