Comparing over-the-scope clip versus endoloop and clips (KING closure) for access site closure: a randomized experimental study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11130%2F13%3A10173741" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11130/13:10173741 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/67985904:_____/13:00394364 RIV/61383082:_____/13:0009 RIV/00023001:_____/13:00058647
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2576-x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2576-x</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2576-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-012-2576-x</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparing over-the-scope clip versus endoloop and clips (KING closure) for access site closure: a randomized experimental study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A safe technique is essential for successful access site closure in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and for closures of iatrogenic perforations. To compare an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus an endoloop + endoclips closure technique (KING closure). 40 minipigs underwent NOTES peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy. Gastrotomies and rectotomies were closed with OTSC (n = 20; 10x stomach, 10x rectum) or KING closure (n = 20; 10x stomach, 10x rectum). The animals were euthanized 28 daysafter the procedure. The main outcome variables were technical feasibility, effectiveness, and healing. Stomach: All but one closure (KING) was successfully completed. The times of closure were similar between the techniques. At necropsy, all access sites were healed. In two animals (1x KING, 1x OTSC), an abscess, probably related to the closure technique, was found. Histologically, transmural healing with muscular bridging was observable in nine pigs for KING versus two pigs for OTSC c
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparing over-the-scope clip versus endoloop and clips (KING closure) for access site closure: a randomized experimental study
Popis výsledku anglicky
A safe technique is essential for successful access site closure in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and for closures of iatrogenic perforations. To compare an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus an endoloop + endoclips closure technique (KING closure). 40 minipigs underwent NOTES peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy. Gastrotomies and rectotomies were closed with OTSC (n = 20; 10x stomach, 10x rectum) or KING closure (n = 20; 10x stomach, 10x rectum). The animals were euthanized 28 daysafter the procedure. The main outcome variables were technical feasibility, effectiveness, and healing. Stomach: All but one closure (KING) was successfully completed. The times of closure were similar between the techniques. At necropsy, all access sites were healed. In two animals (1x KING, 1x OTSC), an abscess, probably related to the closure technique, was found. Histologically, transmural healing with muscular bridging was observable in nine pigs for KING versus two pigs for OTSC c
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NS9994" target="_blank" >NS9994: TRANSLUMINÁLNÍ ENDOSKOPICKÁ CHIRURGIE V EXPERIMENTU NA VELKÉM LABORATORNÍM ZVÍŘETI. ZHODNOCENÍ METODIKY, OPERAČNÍ ZÁTĚŽE A RIZIKA KOMPLIKACÍ.</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Surgical Endoscopy
ISSN
0930-2794
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
27
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1203-1210
Kód UT WoS článku
000316289200022
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—