Libet's experiment: A complex replication
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11130%2F18%3A10376498" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11130/18:10376498 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989592:15210/18:73587504
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.004" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.004</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.004" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.004</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Libet's experiment: A complex replication
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Libet's experiment is an influential classical study, which does not stop provoking heated debates. However, a full-scale replication has not been carried out to this day. Libet-style studies have usually focused on isolated ideas and concepts and never on the whole experiment in all its complexity. This paper presents detailed methodological description and results of a complex replication study. The methodology follows Libet's directions closely in most cases; when it does not, the differences are described and elaborated. The results replicate Libet's key findings, but substantial differences were found in some of the results' categories, such as the introspective reports or the number of readiness-potentials found. The discussion also addresses some current problems pertaining the methodology of the Libet-style experiments and provides some recommendations based on a detailed process evaluation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Libet's experiment: A complex replication
Popis výsledku anglicky
Libet's experiment is an influential classical study, which does not stop provoking heated debates. However, a full-scale replication has not been carried out to this day. Libet-style studies have usually focused on isolated ideas and concepts and never on the whole experiment in all its complexity. This paper presents detailed methodological description and results of a complex replication study. The methodology follows Libet's directions closely in most cases; when it does not, the differences are described and elaborated. The results replicate Libet's key findings, but substantial differences were found in some of the results' categories, such as the introspective reports or the number of readiness-potentials found. The discussion also addresses some current problems pertaining the methodology of the Libet-style experiments and provides some recommendations based on a detailed process evaluation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Consciousness and Cognition
ISSN
1053-8100
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
65
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
October
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
26
Strana od-do
1-26
Kód UT WoS článku
000449238300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85049624001