Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F16%3A10329462" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/16:10329462 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086" target="_blank" >10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We studied the relationships of automated blood pressure (BP), measured in the healthcare centre, with manual office BP and home BP. Stable outpatients treated for hypertension were measured automatically, seated alone in a quiet room, six times after a 5 min rest with the BpTRU device, and immediately afterwards using the auscultatory method. Home BP was measured in a subgroup during 7 days preceding the visit. The automated, office and home BP values were 131.2 +/- 21.8/77.8 +/- 12.1mmHg, 146.9 +/- 20.8/85.8 +/- 12.4mmHg and 137.7 +/- 17.7/79.4 +/- 8.2mmHg, respectively. Limits of agreement between office and automated BP (2 SDs in Bland-Altman plots) were+42.6 to -12.6/+22.6 to -6.6mmHg for systolic/diastolic BP; for home and automated BP they were+45.8 to -25.8/+20.8 to -12.6mmHg. For patients with two visits, intraclass correlation coefficients of BP values measured during the first and second visits were 0.66/0.72 for systolic/diastolic automated BP and 0.68/0.74 for systolic/diastolic office BP. Automated BP was lower than home BP and no more closely related to home BP than to office BP. It did not show better repeatability than office BP. Whether automated BP and the white-coat effect, calculated cas the office BP-automated BP difference, have clinical and prognostic importance deserves further studies.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Popis výsledku anglicky

We studied the relationships of automated blood pressure (BP), measured in the healthcare centre, with manual office BP and home BP. Stable outpatients treated for hypertension were measured automatically, seated alone in a quiet room, six times after a 5 min rest with the BpTRU device, and immediately afterwards using the auscultatory method. Home BP was measured in a subgroup during 7 days preceding the visit. The automated, office and home BP values were 131.2 +/- 21.8/77.8 +/- 12.1mmHg, 146.9 +/- 20.8/85.8 +/- 12.4mmHg and 137.7 +/- 17.7/79.4 +/- 8.2mmHg, respectively. Limits of agreement between office and automated BP (2 SDs in Bland-Altman plots) were+42.6 to -12.6/+22.6 to -6.6mmHg for systolic/diastolic BP; for home and automated BP they were+45.8 to -25.8/+20.8 to -12.6mmHg. For patients with two visits, intraclass correlation coefficients of BP values measured during the first and second visits were 0.66/0.72 for systolic/diastolic automated BP and 0.68/0.74 for systolic/diastolic office BP. Automated BP was lower than home BP and no more closely related to home BP than to office BP. It did not show better repeatability than office BP. Whether automated BP and the white-coat effect, calculated cas the office BP-automated BP difference, have clinical and prognostic importance deserves further studies.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Blood Pressure

ISSN

0803-7051

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

25

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

228-234

Kód UT WoS článku

000380053800005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84958037665