Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in children
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F23%3AE0110252" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/23:E0110252 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11140/21:10432316 RIV/00216208:11130/21:10432316 RIV/00669806:_____/21:10432316 RIV/00064203:_____/21:10432316 a 2 dalších
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08037051.2023.2195006" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08037051.2023.2195006</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2023.2195006" target="_blank" >10.1080/08037051.2023.2195006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in children
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In our most recent study on unattended automated office blood pressure (uAOBP) measurement in children and adolescents published in Blood Pressure last year we have demonstrated that the uAOBP was significantly lower than office BP (OBP) both for systolic and diastolic values (-13.6 and -7.6 mmHg, p < 0.0001). This was different from the results from the first study on AOBP in children published by Hanevold et al. three years ago who found less pronounced differences between AOBP and OBP values (-4.5 and -1.0 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). In our discussion we have hypothesized that the discrepant results between our and Hanevold's study could be due to the lack of a rest period in the first subgroup of children investigated in the later study however we didn't have the data comparing AOBP between children with and without a 5 min rest period before the AOBP measurement as they were not published.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in children
Popis výsledku anglicky
In our most recent study on unattended automated office blood pressure (uAOBP) measurement in children and adolescents published in Blood Pressure last year we have demonstrated that the uAOBP was significantly lower than office BP (OBP) both for systolic and diastolic values (-13.6 and -7.6 mmHg, p < 0.0001). This was different from the results from the first study on AOBP in children published by Hanevold et al. three years ago who found less pronounced differences between AOBP and OBP values (-4.5 and -1.0 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). In our discussion we have hypothesized that the discrepant results between our and Hanevold's study could be due to the lack of a rest period in the first subgroup of children investigated in the later study however we didn't have the data comparing AOBP between children with and without a 5 min rest period before the AOBP measurement as they were not published.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30209 - Paediatrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Blood pressure
ISSN
0803-7051
e-ISSN
1651-1999
Svazek periodika
32
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
2
Strana od-do
1-2
Kód UT WoS článku
000976059500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85153065671