Monitoring after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) vs. contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT), two days after procedure

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F18%3A10375690" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/18:10375690 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00669806:_____/18:10375690

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/pdfs/bio/2018/04/09.pdf" target="_blank" >http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/pdfs/bio/2018/04/09.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2018.025" target="_blank" >10.5507/bp.2018.025</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Monitoring after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) vs. contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT), two days after procedure

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Our research evaluated the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast enhanced computer tomography (CECT), performed 48 h after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), to detect residual tumor tissue. As recently published studies have evaluated periprocedural CEUS performed within 24 h after procedure and their results were not satisfactory, it seems that postponing the control test by one day could increase the sensitivity of both methods. The quality of tumor residue detection in 48-h CEUS was comparable to that of 48-h CECT. This finding suggests the CEUS being a feasible substitute for CECT. Both methods show reasonable sensitivity; therefore this timing seems to be appropriate for the first post-treatment control while also allowing for early retreatment if residual tumor tissue is found.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Monitoring after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) vs. contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT), two days after procedure

Popis výsledku anglicky

Our research evaluated the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast enhanced computer tomography (CECT), performed 48 h after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), to detect residual tumor tissue. As recently published studies have evaluated periprocedural CEUS performed within 24 h after procedure and their results were not satisfactory, it seems that postponing the control test by one day could increase the sensitivity of both methods. The quality of tumor residue detection in 48-h CEUS was comparable to that of 48-h CECT. This finding suggests the CEUS being a feasible substitute for CECT. Both methods show reasonable sensitivity; therefore this timing seems to be appropriate for the first post-treatment control while also allowing for early retreatment if residual tumor tissue is found.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biomedical Papers

ISSN

1213-8118

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

162

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

304-309

Kód UT WoS článku

000457488200009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85057318048