Patent hemostasis and comparison of two compression devices after transradial coronary catheterization and intervention

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F18%3A10375702" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/18:10375702 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00669806:_____/18:10375702

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.07.003" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.07.003</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.07.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.07.003</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Patent hemostasis and comparison of two compression devices after transradial coronary catheterization and intervention

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare two compression devices after transradial coronary catheterization and intervention. Methods: Out of 280 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization and intervention (n = 74) as a part of a same-day discharge program, 140 patients were applied the TR Band (TB) compression device and 140 the Seal-One (SO) compression device. The time needed to achieve patent hemostasis, duration of compression and local complications were assessed. Results: In the TB group, patent hemostasis was achieved in 17.5 + 10.3 min (min), in the SO group in 21.4 + 10.5 min (p = NS). The duration of radial artery compression was 90.7 + 38.4 min in the TB group and 64.0 + 26.5 min in the SO group (p &lt; 0.001). The incidence of hematomas &gt;= 5 cm did not differ between the two groups (6.4% vs. 6.4%, p = NS), the incidence of hematomas larger than 10 cm was 0.7% in the TB group and 1.4% in the SO group (p = NS). No radial artery occlusion or other local complications were found. Conclusion: Postprocedural radial artery compression with TR Band and Seal-One devices is associated with early patent hemostasis and a short duration of compression. The use of the Seal-One device was related to a shorter mean compression time in this study. No radial artery occlusion at discharge, nor any other local complications occurred following the radial artery compression, except for several clinically insignificant hematomas.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Patent hemostasis and comparison of two compression devices after transradial coronary catheterization and intervention

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare two compression devices after transradial coronary catheterization and intervention. Methods: Out of 280 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization and intervention (n = 74) as a part of a same-day discharge program, 140 patients were applied the TR Band (TB) compression device and 140 the Seal-One (SO) compression device. The time needed to achieve patent hemostasis, duration of compression and local complications were assessed. Results: In the TB group, patent hemostasis was achieved in 17.5 + 10.3 min (min), in the SO group in 21.4 + 10.5 min (p = NS). The duration of radial artery compression was 90.7 + 38.4 min in the TB group and 64.0 + 26.5 min in the SO group (p &lt; 0.001). The incidence of hematomas &gt;= 5 cm did not differ between the two groups (6.4% vs. 6.4%, p = NS), the incidence of hematomas larger than 10 cm was 0.7% in the TB group and 1.4% in the SO group (p = NS). No radial artery occlusion or other local complications were found. Conclusion: Postprocedural radial artery compression with TR Band and Seal-One devices is associated with early patent hemostasis and a short duration of compression. The use of the Seal-One device was related to a shorter mean compression time in this study. No radial artery occlusion at discharge, nor any other local complications occurred following the radial artery compression, except for several clinically insignificant hematomas.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cor et Vasa

ISSN

0010-8650

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

"E122"-"E126"

Kód UT WoS článku

000429583200003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85028364231