Medial and Superior Orbital Decompression: Improving Access for Endonasal Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F15%3A10316330" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11150/15:10316330 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00159816:_____/15:00063331 RIV/00179906:_____/15:10316330

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003489415595423" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003489415595423</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003489415595423" target="_blank" >10.1177/0003489415595423</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Medial and Superior Orbital Decompression: Improving Access for Endonasal Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective: Visualization by Draf I-III endoscopic access to the frontal sinus via drainage pathways is sometimes inadequate. We compare lateral frontal sinus exposures by Draf approaches versus our modification of removing the medial-superior wall of theorbit while preserving the periorbita. Methods: Twenty cadaveric heads dissected using Draf IIB, III, and modified Draf III with medial and superior orbital decompression (MSOD) underwent thin-cut computed tomography (CT) scanning. Under image guidance,measurements extended from the midline crista gali to the most lateral point of the frontal sinus. A case report shows the modified Draf III improved frontal sinus access. Results: Comparing Draf IIB and III with Draf III with MSOD, respectively, distances between midline and most lateral point averaged 19.1 mm, 23.7 mm, and 30.4 mm (left) and 18.7 mm, 25.1 mm, and 32.2 mm (right). Differences between Draf III with/without MSOD were 6.65 mm (left) and 7.09 mm (right); 12 heads were excl

Název v anglickém jazyce

Medial and Superior Orbital Decompression: Improving Access for Endonasal Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective: Visualization by Draf I-III endoscopic access to the frontal sinus via drainage pathways is sometimes inadequate. We compare lateral frontal sinus exposures by Draf approaches versus our modification of removing the medial-superior wall of theorbit while preserving the periorbita. Methods: Twenty cadaveric heads dissected using Draf IIB, III, and modified Draf III with medial and superior orbital decompression (MSOD) underwent thin-cut computed tomography (CT) scanning. Under image guidance,measurements extended from the midline crista gali to the most lateral point of the frontal sinus. A case report shows the modified Draf III improved frontal sinus access. Results: Comparing Draf IIB and III with Draf III with MSOD, respectively, distances between midline and most lateral point averaged 19.1 mm, 23.7 mm, and 30.4 mm (left) and 18.7 mm, 25.1 mm, and 32.2 mm (right). Differences between Draf III with/without MSOD were 6.65 mm (left) and 7.09 mm (right); 12 heads were excl

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/ED1.100%2F02%2F0123" target="_blank" >ED1.100/02/0123: Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně - Mezinárodní centrum klinického výzkumu (FNUSA - ICRC)</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

ISSN

0003-4894

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

124

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

987-995

Kód UT WoS článku

000364818000010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84953439768