The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: the points of view of European rural general practitioners

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F21%3A10433511" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11150/21:10433511 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=JcfSkQLTDP" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=JcfSkQLTDP</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22605/RRH6509" target="_blank" >10.22605/RRH6509</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: the points of view of European rural general practitioners

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction: This article describes the views of European rural general practitioners regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the implementation of a chronic care model (CCM) in European rural primary care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods online survey. Data were collected from 227 general practitioners between May and December 2017. Categorical data were analysed using descriptive methods while free-text responses were analysed using qualitative methods. The setting was rural primary care in nine European countries (including Central and Eastern Europe). Main outcomes measures were respondents&apos; evaluations of a chronic care model in their rural healthcare settings in terms of SWOT. Results: The SWOT analysis showed that the expertise of healthcare professionals and the strength of relationships and communications between professionals, caregivers and patients are positive components of the CCM system. However, ensuring adequate staffing levels and staff competency are issues that would need to be addressed. Opportunities included the need to enable patients to participate in decision making by ensuring adequate health literacy. Conclusion: The CCM could certainly have benefits for health care in rural settings but staffing levels and staff competency would need to be addressed before implementation of CCM in such settings. Improving health literacy among patients and their carers will be essential to ensure their full participation in the implementation of a successful CCM.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The pros and cons of the implementation of a chronic care model in European rural primary care: the points of view of European rural general practitioners

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction: This article describes the views of European rural general practitioners regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the implementation of a chronic care model (CCM) in European rural primary care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods online survey. Data were collected from 227 general practitioners between May and December 2017. Categorical data were analysed using descriptive methods while free-text responses were analysed using qualitative methods. The setting was rural primary care in nine European countries (including Central and Eastern Europe). Main outcomes measures were respondents&apos; evaluations of a chronic care model in their rural healthcare settings in terms of SWOT. Results: The SWOT analysis showed that the expertise of healthcare professionals and the strength of relationships and communications between professionals, caregivers and patients are positive components of the CCM system. However, ensuring adequate staffing levels and staff competency are issues that would need to be addressed. Opportunities included the need to enable patients to participate in decision making by ensuring adequate health literacy. Conclusion: The CCM could certainly have benefits for health care in rural settings but staffing levels and staff competency would need to be addressed before implementation of CCM in such settings. Improving health literacy among patients and their carers will be essential to ensure their full participation in the implementation of a successful CCM.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30304 - Public and environmental health

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Rural and remote health

ISSN

1445-6354

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

AU - Austrálie

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

6509

Kód UT WoS článku

000722558700012

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85115283649