Models and Perspicuous Representations

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F12%3A10126100" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/12:10126100 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110296679/9783110296679.185/9783110296679.185.xml" target="_blank" >http://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110296679/9783110296679.185/9783110296679.185.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Models and Perspicuous Representations

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In his first monograph, Grundprobleme der Logik, Pirmin Stekeler offered a version of "immediacy critique" according to which, to sum up the book's central thesis, logic does not describe or explain natural language but only constructs synoptic models tobe compared with and projected onto it. The roots of this claim are deeply Wittgensteinian, Stekeler's "models of language" being, in fact, nothing other than Wittgenstein's "perspicuous representations" of linguistic practices where, by these practicesor "language games," what is meant is something rule-governed and thus normatively charged but not necessarily discursive in a way in which Sellar's and Brandom's game of giving and asking for reasons is. In my paper, I want to draw on some points of Stekeler's and Wittgenstein's approach to language by extending their repertoire of perspicuous representations - coming mainly from purely logical or visually controlled spaces (see, e.g., Stekeler's reconstructions of Aristotle's picture

Název v anglickém jazyce

Models and Perspicuous Representations

Popis výsledku anglicky

In his first monograph, Grundprobleme der Logik, Pirmin Stekeler offered a version of "immediacy critique" according to which, to sum up the book's central thesis, logic does not describe or explain natural language but only constructs synoptic models tobe compared with and projected onto it. The roots of this claim are deeply Wittgensteinian, Stekeler's "models of language" being, in fact, nothing other than Wittgenstein's "perspicuous representations" of linguistic practices where, by these practicesor "language games," what is meant is something rule-governed and thus normatively charged but not necessarily discursive in a way in which Sellar's and Brandom's game of giving and asking for reasons is. In my paper, I want to draw on some points of Stekeler's and Wittgenstein's approach to language by extending their repertoire of perspicuous representations - coming mainly from purely logical or visually controlled spaces (see, e.g., Stekeler's reconstructions of Aristotle's picture

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP401%2F11%2F0371" target="_blank" >GAP401/11/0371: Apriorní, syntetické a analytické od středověku po současnou filozofii</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů