Divine Ideas, Instants of Nature, and the Spectre of "verum esse secundum quid" : A Criticism of M. Renemann's Interpretation of Scotus

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F12%3A10126949" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/12:10126949 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://secure.pdcnet.org/studneoar/content/studneoar_2012_0009_0002_0185_0203" target="_blank" >http://secure.pdcnet.org/studneoar/content/studneoar_2012_0009_0002_0185_0203</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Divine Ideas, Instants of Nature, and the Spectre of "verum esse secundum quid" : A Criticism of M. Renemann's Interpretation of Scotus

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The purpose of this review article is to off er a criticism of the interpretation of Duns Scotus's conception of intelligible being that has been proposed by Michael Renemann in his book Gedanken als Wirkursachen. In the fi rst place, the author shows that according to Scotus, for God "to produce a thing in intelligible being" and "to conceive a thing" amounts to altogether one and the same act. Esse intelligibile therefore does not have "priority of nature" with respect to "esse intellectum" or "esse repraesentatum", contrary to Renemann's interpretation. The distinction between Scotus's second and third "instants of nature" consists in something else, then: the relation of reason, of which Scotus says that it is produced in the third instant, is notthe relation of being actually conceived (fi rst, because actual intellection comes already in the second instant, and second, because divine intellection, being the measure of the conceived objects, is not relative bud absolute) but it i

Název v anglickém jazyce

Divine Ideas, Instants of Nature, and the Spectre of "verum esse secundum quid" : A Criticism of M. Renemann's Interpretation of Scotus

Popis výsledku anglicky

The purpose of this review article is to off er a criticism of the interpretation of Duns Scotus's conception of intelligible being that has been proposed by Michael Renemann in his book Gedanken als Wirkursachen. In the fi rst place, the author shows that according to Scotus, for God "to produce a thing in intelligible being" and "to conceive a thing" amounts to altogether one and the same act. Esse intelligibile therefore does not have "priority of nature" with respect to "esse intellectum" or "esse repraesentatum", contrary to Renemann's interpretation. The distinction between Scotus's second and third "instants of nature" consists in something else, then: the relation of reason, of which Scotus says that it is produced in the third instant, is notthe relation of being actually conceived (fi rst, because actual intellection comes already in the second instant, and second, because divine intellection, being the measure of the conceived objects, is not relative bud absolute) but it i

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP401%2F11%2F0906" target="_blank" >GAP401/11/0906: Možnosti realistické epistemologie tváří v tvář novověké kritice</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Neoaristotelica

ISSN

1214-8407

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9 (2012)

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

185-203

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—