Killing of Eratosthenes between reality and mime
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F13%3A10173163" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/13:10173163 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://digilib.phil.muni.cz/bitstream/handle/11222.digilib/127204/1_GraecoLatinaBrunensia_18-2013-1_13.pdf?sequence=1" target="_blank" >http://digilib.phil.muni.cz/bitstream/handle/11222.digilib/127204/1_GraecoLatinaBrunensia_18-2013-1_13.pdf?sequence=1</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Killing of Eratosthenes between reality and mime
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Lysias' speech On the Murder of Eratosthenes deals with a case of a husband (named Euphiletus) who caught an adulterer (called Eratosthenes) in flagrante delicto with his wife, killed him and pleaded before a court that what he had done was in keeping with law. In a stimulating article written in 1997, J. R. Porter pointed out many parallels with plots of mimes and adduced some additional arguments from comparison with other Athenian court speeches, which led him to suggest that the speech has never been pronounced and is actually a rhetorical exhibition, made by Lysias in order to advertise his skill. The main purpose of this paper is to challenge this assumption. Further, a tentative suggestion concerning the date of the speech's composition is made.A problem of a familiarity of average Athenian with mimic productions is raised, too.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Killing of Eratosthenes between reality and mime
Popis výsledku anglicky
Lysias' speech On the Murder of Eratosthenes deals with a case of a husband (named Euphiletus) who caught an adulterer (called Eratosthenes) in flagrante delicto with his wife, killed him and pleaded before a court that what he had done was in keeping with law. In a stimulating article written in 1997, J. R. Porter pointed out many parallels with plots of mimes and adduced some additional arguments from comparison with other Athenian court speeches, which led him to suggest that the speech has never been pronounced and is actually a rhetorical exhibition, made by Lysias in order to advertise his skill. The main purpose of this paper is to challenge this assumption. Further, a tentative suggestion concerning the date of the speech's composition is made.A problem of a familiarity of average Athenian with mimic productions is raised, too.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AB - Dějiny
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Graeco-Latina Brunensia
ISSN
1803-7402
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
159-170
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—