Auctor nominis eius Christus: Tacitus' Knowledge of the Origins of Christianity

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F17%3A10360746" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/17:10360746 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.15" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.15</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.15" target="_blank" >10.14712/24646830.2017.15</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Auctor nominis eius Christus: Tacitus' Knowledge of the Origins of Christianity

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Tacitus&apos; information about the beginnings of Christianity contains details, which may be historically precise. He learnt them, perhaps, from Christian followers of some other than the received tradition, whom he could have tried during his proconsulship of Asia. Dio&apos;s account of the trial of Flavius Clemens and others is probably taken from Tacitus, who in his capacity of quindecemvir sacris faciundis could have participated or been interested in the trial. Dio&apos;s actual formulation of this account omitting Christianity should thus be believed. The implication is that, when treating this affair in his Histories, prior to his sojourn to Asia, Tacitus need not have known anything yet about Christianity, and its beginnings in particular. His information would thus come exclusively from Asia and could be treated as such by modern scholarship.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Auctor nominis eius Christus: Tacitus' Knowledge of the Origins of Christianity

Popis výsledku anglicky

Tacitus&apos; information about the beginnings of Christianity contains details, which may be historically precise. He learnt them, perhaps, from Christian followers of some other than the received tradition, whom he could have tried during his proconsulship of Asia. Dio&apos;s account of the trial of Flavius Clemens and others is probably taken from Tacitus, who in his capacity of quindecemvir sacris faciundis could have participated or been interested in the trial. Dio&apos;s actual formulation of this account omitting Christianity should thus be believed. The implication is that, when treating this affair in his Histories, prior to his sojourn to Asia, Tacitus need not have known anything yet about Christianity, and its beginnings in particular. His information would thus come exclusively from Asia and could be treated as such by modern scholarship.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Philologica

ISSN

0567-8269

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2017

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

95-110

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—