The Eurasianism concept: Russian vs Wes-tern perspectives
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F20%3A10418550" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/20:10418550 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11240/20:10418550
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=dPt5Rh5c3-" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=dPt5Rh5c3-</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2020-3-42-48" target="_blank" >10.33581/2521-6821-2020-3-42-48</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Eurasianism concept: Russian vs Wes-tern perspectives
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article is dedicated to the concept of Eurasianism in the context of two approaches: Russian and Western. It will focus on how the idea of Eurasia has evolved over time first among Russian emigrants in Czechoslovakia, France and the USA in the period between the two world wars (P. Savitskii, N. Trubetskoy, G. Vernadsky), later - from the late 20th century in the USSR and in Russia itself (L. Gumilev, A. Dugin), and finally today, in the framework of Western social sciences (K. Hann). The aim of this paper is to give an indication of how this concept has served at different times and how its content has changed depending on the personality of the researcher and his worldview. The novelty of the approach is in contrasting the Russian and Western concepts of Eurasianism. The Russian perspectives speak of Eurasia within the framework of the Russian Empire or within the framework of the Soviet Union. The Western perspective is much wider than the Russian one and covers Europe and Asia. It was formed in the context of socio-anthropological research as an attempt to explain the processes taking place in post-communist countries, but it was also criticized. The fundamental question concerns its professional sta-tus - is it merely an ideological construction or does it have scientific substance?
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Eurasianism concept: Russian vs Wes-tern perspectives
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article is dedicated to the concept of Eurasianism in the context of two approaches: Russian and Western. It will focus on how the idea of Eurasia has evolved over time first among Russian emigrants in Czechoslovakia, France and the USA in the period between the two world wars (P. Savitskii, N. Trubetskoy, G. Vernadsky), later - from the late 20th century in the USSR and in Russia itself (L. Gumilev, A. Dugin), and finally today, in the framework of Western social sciences (K. Hann). The aim of this paper is to give an indication of how this concept has served at different times and how its content has changed depending on the personality of the researcher and his worldview. The novelty of the approach is in contrasting the Russian and Western concepts of Eurasianism. The Russian perspectives speak of Eurasia within the framework of the Russian Empire or within the framework of the Soviet Union. The Western perspective is much wider than the Russian one and covers Europe and Asia. It was formed in the context of socio-anthropological research as an attempt to explain the processes taking place in post-communist countries, but it was also criticized. The fundamental question concerns its professional sta-tus - is it merely an ideological construction or does it have scientific substance?
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50401 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology.
ISSN
2521-6821
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2020
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
BY - Běloruská republika
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
42-48
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—