Intersubjectivity and Sociality
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F20%3A10419496" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/20:10419496 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003084013-25" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003084013-25</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003084013-25" target="_blank" >10.4324/9781003084013-25</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Intersubjectivity and Sociality
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The phenomenological discussion on intersubjectivity, lasting for over a century, can be retrospectively structured along several lines. One of them is the distinction between the theories of intersubjectivity based on experiences oriented towards individual others and the theories based on being-with others (on co-existence). While the former theories (Husserl, Scheler, Stein, Levinas, Sartre) claim that intersubjectivity (in a more restricted I-thou meaning) is a precondition of sociality, the latter (Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Fink) affirm the opposite: our concrete encounters are possible only because we already live in a shared (social) world, which implies that we understand another not primarily as a concrete "thou", but as "anyone". The exposition in this entry takes this distinction as its guiding line. As we show in the concluding part, this distinction does not exhaust possible modalities of the relation of I and the Other. A concept of renewed importance, the group or plural subject, enters the discussion, casting new light on classic phenomenologists and opening new perspectives on intersubjectivity.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Intersubjectivity and Sociality
Popis výsledku anglicky
The phenomenological discussion on intersubjectivity, lasting for over a century, can be retrospectively structured along several lines. One of them is the distinction between the theories of intersubjectivity based on experiences oriented towards individual others and the theories based on being-with others (on co-existence). While the former theories (Husserl, Scheler, Stein, Levinas, Sartre) claim that intersubjectivity (in a more restricted I-thou meaning) is a precondition of sociality, the latter (Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Fink) affirm the opposite: our concrete encounters are possible only because we already live in a shared (social) world, which implies that we understand another not primarily as a concrete "thou", but as "anyone". The exposition in this entry takes this distinction as its guiding line. As we show in the concluding part, this distinction does not exhaust possible modalities of the relation of I and the Other. A concept of renewed importance, the group or plural subject, enters the discussion, casting new light on classic phenomenologists and opening new perspectives on intersubjectivity.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA18-16622S" target="_blank" >GA18-16622S: Osobní identita na rozcestí. Fenomenologické, genealogické a hegelovské přístupy</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy
ISBN
978-0-367-53999-3
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
259-270
Počet stran knihy
840
Název nakladatele
Routledge
Místo vydání
London
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—