Structure of second-grade diminutives in Czech and Slovak. A corpus-based synchronic-diachronic analysis
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F21%3A10442313" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/21:10442313 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ihuN.BZSRc" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ihuN.BZSRc</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-3-111-117" target="_blank" >10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-3-111-117</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Structure of second-grade diminutives in Czech and Slovak. A corpus-based synchronic-diachronic analysis
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In Slavic languages, diminutivization is a highly productive morphological process. A diminutive marker can be attached to nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs. Secondary or even multiple diminutives are also possible. Considering the combinability of diminutive suffi xes in nouns, Manova and Winternitz (2011) claim that only productive DIM1 suffi xes function as DIM2 suffi xes. The aim of this paper is to verify this idea on the basis of the analysis of data from Czech and Slovak. The DIM2 for the analysis were excerpted from the corpora. Neither Czech nor Slovak current sources apprehend diminutive markers as combinations of primary and secondary diminutive suffi xes. The complex character of secondary diminutivizers is understood as a diachronic issue. Therefore, a historical analysis of all secondary diminutives was necessary. The research proved the assumption about the combinability of diminutive markers. The analysis also revealed that unproductive DIM2 suffi xes are attached by substitution in both languages.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Structure of second-grade diminutives in Czech and Slovak. A corpus-based synchronic-diachronic analysis
Popis výsledku anglicky
In Slavic languages, diminutivization is a highly productive morphological process. A diminutive marker can be attached to nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs. Secondary or even multiple diminutives are also possible. Considering the combinability of diminutive suffi xes in nouns, Manova and Winternitz (2011) claim that only productive DIM1 suffi xes function as DIM2 suffi xes. The aim of this paper is to verify this idea on the basis of the analysis of data from Czech and Slovak. The DIM2 for the analysis were excerpted from the corpora. Neither Czech nor Slovak current sources apprehend diminutive markers as combinations of primary and secondary diminutive suffi xes. The complex character of secondary diminutivizers is understood as a diachronic issue. Therefore, a historical analysis of all secondary diminutives was necessary. The research proved the assumption about the combinability of diminutive markers. The analysis also revealed that unproductive DIM2 suffi xes are attached by substitution in both languages.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Estestvennonaučnaâ seriâ
ISSN
2541-7525
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2021
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
RU - Ruská federace
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
111-117
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—