Auxiliary selection in Italo-Romance and inflexional classes

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F22%3A10452934" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/22:10452934 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/periphrasis-and-inflexion-in-diachrony-9780198870807?q=ledgeway&lang=en&cc=us#" target="_blank" >https://global.oup.com/academic/product/periphrasis-and-inflexion-in-diachrony-9780198870807?q=ledgeway&lang=en&cc=us#</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Auxiliary selection in Italo-Romance and inflexional classes

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This chapter puts forward an account of auxiliary selection in terms of inflexional classes (following, e.g. Bonami 2015:97; Baerman, Brown, and Corbett 2015:28f.), theoretically couched within Stump&apos;s notions of content paradigm, form paradigm, and segregated inflexional classes (Stump 2016). It is argued that the inflexion-class behaviour of auxiliary selection can best be seen in cases of mixed perfective auxiliation systems attested in a range of Italo-Romance varieties, where an intricate alternation of the two auxiliaries HAVE and BE is found within one and the same paradigm. The chapter focuses on cases where one coherent class of lexemes, namely reflexives, is split between the two auxiliaries giving rise to a mixed paradigm which is an instance of heteroclisis (cf. Stump 2006; Kaye 2015; Bach 2019). It is hypothesized that this kind of reflexive heteroclisis might be one of the origins of mixed perfective auxiliation systems in Italo-Romance.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Auxiliary selection in Italo-Romance and inflexional classes

Popis výsledku anglicky

This chapter puts forward an account of auxiliary selection in terms of inflexional classes (following, e.g. Bonami 2015:97; Baerman, Brown, and Corbett 2015:28f.), theoretically couched within Stump&apos;s notions of content paradigm, form paradigm, and segregated inflexional classes (Stump 2016). It is argued that the inflexion-class behaviour of auxiliary selection can best be seen in cases of mixed perfective auxiliation systems attested in a range of Italo-Romance varieties, where an intricate alternation of the two auxiliaries HAVE and BE is found within one and the same paradigm. The chapter focuses on cases where one coherent class of lexemes, namely reflexives, is split between the two auxiliaries giving rise to a mixed paradigm which is an instance of heteroclisis (cf. Stump 2006; Kaye 2015; Bach 2019). It is hypothesized that this kind of reflexive heteroclisis might be one of the origins of mixed perfective auxiliation systems in Italo-Romance.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF16_019%2F0000734" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000734: Kreativita a adaptabilita jako předpoklad úspěchu Evropy v propojeném světě</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Inflexion in Diachrony. A View from Romance

ISBN

978-0-19-887080-7

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

193-212

Počet stran knihy

485

Název nakladatele

Oxford University Press

Místo vydání

Oxford

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—