What Kind of Culture Took place in Houses of Culture? The Ideology of Cultural Infrastructure in Historical Perspective

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F23%3A10470548" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/23:10470548 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

What Kind of Culture Took place in Houses of Culture? The Ideology of Cultural Infrastructure in Historical Perspective

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In modern history, houses of culture and their predecessors stand at the intersection of many social and political trends that have jointly determined not only what went on inside, but also how the buildings looked and how they came into being. As a result of these broader trends, the social role of buildings that were used for the performance of culture also changed, especially in relation to other modern institutions. In this text, I attempt to distinguish four phases that reflect the ideological and social complexes that gave form, shape, structure and life to the houses of culture. These phases are partly intertwined and we find important contiguities between them that, perhaps surprisingly, transcend the traditional milestones of 20th-century history characterised by changes of &quot;political regimes&quot;. Genuine regimes of knowledge have their own dynamics, which, though not independent of political systems, can nevertheless &quot;migrate&quot; between different political discourses and social orders.

Název v anglickém jazyce

What Kind of Culture Took place in Houses of Culture? The Ideology of Cultural Infrastructure in Historical Perspective

Popis výsledku anglicky

In modern history, houses of culture and their predecessors stand at the intersection of many social and political trends that have jointly determined not only what went on inside, but also how the buildings looked and how they came into being. As a result of these broader trends, the social role of buildings that were used for the performance of culture also changed, especially in relation to other modern institutions. In this text, I attempt to distinguish four phases that reflect the ideological and social complexes that gave form, shape, structure and life to the houses of culture. These phases are partly intertwined and we find important contiguities between them that, perhaps surprisingly, transcend the traditional milestones of 20th-century history characterised by changes of &quot;political regimes&quot;. Genuine regimes of knowledge have their own dynamics, which, though not independent of political systems, can nevertheless &quot;migrate&quot; between different political discourses and social orders.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Enlightenment, Culture, Leisure: Houses of Culture in Czechoslovakia

ISBN

978-80-88308-97-3

Počet stran výsledku

44

Strana od-do

81-124

Počet stran knihy

888

Název nakladatele

Academy of Art, Architecture and Design

Místo vydání

Praha

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—