Heidegger and Patočka on the Primacy of Practices and Phenomenological Pragmatism
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F23%3A10482451" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/23:10482451 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=tJLm4rzRpQ" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=tJLm4rzRpQ</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09677-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10746-023-09677-3</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Heidegger and Patočka on the Primacy of Practices and Phenomenological Pragmatism
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this paper, I will argue that J. Patočka's conception of three movements of human existence can be considered a contribution to the "pragmatic turn" in phenomenology. In order to demonstrate this contribution, I will first recapitulate the context of pragmatic turn, outlining both Heidegger's original position and its consequent pragmatic interpretation offered by H. Dreyfus and other scholars. The core of the pragmatic interpretation is based on a modification of the Primacy of Praxis thesis that can be described as the Primacy of Practices thesis, according to which our background practices, i.e., the 'contingent ways of acting and judging,' operate as a "source" of intelligibility. Based on Patočka's criticisms, I will further argue that Heidegger-inspired pragmatism is hampered by the opposition between authentic and inauthentic disclosure, leading to both the rigidification of everyday practices and rendering authentic disclosure formal and empty. In the final section, I will demonstrate that Patočka's own conception of the three movements of existence can be seen as committed to the Primacy of Practices thesis and that this version of the Primacy of Practice thesis is more acceptable because it does not share the disdainful attitude in regards of the public world.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Heidegger and Patočka on the Primacy of Practices and Phenomenological Pragmatism
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this paper, I will argue that J. Patočka's conception of three movements of human existence can be considered a contribution to the "pragmatic turn" in phenomenology. In order to demonstrate this contribution, I will first recapitulate the context of pragmatic turn, outlining both Heidegger's original position and its consequent pragmatic interpretation offered by H. Dreyfus and other scholars. The core of the pragmatic interpretation is based on a modification of the Primacy of Praxis thesis that can be described as the Primacy of Practices thesis, according to which our background practices, i.e., the 'contingent ways of acting and judging,' operate as a "source" of intelligibility. Based on Patočka's criticisms, I will further argue that Heidegger-inspired pragmatism is hampered by the opposition between authentic and inauthentic disclosure, leading to both the rigidification of everyday practices and rendering authentic disclosure formal and empty. In the final section, I will demonstrate that Patočka's own conception of the three movements of existence can be seen as committed to the Primacy of Practices thesis and that this version of the Primacy of Practice thesis is more acceptable because it does not share the disdainful attitude in regards of the public world.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Human Studies
ISSN
0163-8548
e-ISSN
1572-851X
Svazek periodika
46
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
September 2023
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
505-526
Kód UT WoS článku
000999756200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85160836041