Axiom of Choice and Continuum Hypothesis - Connections and Differences
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F23%3A10493359" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/23:10493359 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ySPi50e.Hq" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ySPi50e.Hq</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46938/tv.2022.546" target="_blank" >10.46938/tv.2022.546</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
čeština
Název v původním jazyce
Axiom of Choice and Continuum Hypothesis - Connections and Differences
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We compare two well-known set-theoretical statements, namely the axiom of choice and the continuum hypothesis, with regard to their historical development and formulation, as well as their consequences in mathematics. It is known that both statements are independent from the other axioms of set theory (if they are consistent). The axiom of choice - despite initial controversies - is today almost universally accepted as an axiom. However, the status of the continuum hypothesis is more complex and no agreement has been found so far: both the continuum hypothesis and its negation (often as consequences of stronger statements) decide several mathematical problems differently, but in contrast with the axiom of choice it is not clear which of the two solutions should be the "correct" one (in the sense of an agreement within the community).
Název v anglickém jazyce
Axiom of Choice and Continuum Hypothesis - Connections and Differences
Popis výsledku anglicky
We compare two well-known set-theoretical statements, namely the axiom of choice and the continuum hypothesis, with regard to their historical development and formulation, as well as their consequences in mathematics. It is known that both statements are independent from the other axioms of set theory (if they are consistent). The axiom of choice - despite initial controversies - is today almost universally accepted as an axiom. However, the status of the continuum hypothesis is more complex and no agreement has been found so far: both the continuum hypothesis and its negation (often as consequences of stronger statements) decide several mathematical problems differently, but in contrast with the axiom of choice it is not clear which of the two solutions should be the "correct" one (in the sense of an agreement within the community).
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Teorie vědy / Theory of Science
ISSN
1210-0250
e-ISSN
1804-6347
Svazek periodika
45
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
27
Strana od-do
67-93
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85163991821