Passing-on-Standing Matrix in Private Antitrust Enforcement:: a Reconciliation of Economic and Justice Approaches

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F13%3A10190567" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/13:10190567 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/28517/MWP_2013_30.pdf?sequence=1" target="_blank" >http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/28517/MWP_2013_30.pdf?sequence=1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Passing-on-Standing Matrix in Private Antitrust Enforcement:: a Reconciliation of Economic and Justice Approaches

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Any scheme for private antitrust enforcement is framed by two main questions: who will have standing - direct or indirect purchasers - and will the passing-on defense be allowed. Imagine that a cartel of oil producers forces gas stations - direct purchasers - to buy petrol at a higher than competitive price. The gas stations then raise the price for the final customers - indirect purchasers. When the gas stations sue the cartel, the cartelist will claim that no damage has occurred to the gas stations, because the gas stations have passed on the overcharge to its final customers - the passing-on defense. In the United States, the ruling of the California Supreme Court in Clayworth v. Pfizer, alongside a report of the Antitrust Modernization Commission of 2007, spurred new debate on whether the 1970s Federal case law should be overruled. The situation in the European Union has been even more challenging. The Court of Justice of the EU surprised everybody with two landmark cases in the ea

Název v anglickém jazyce

Passing-on-Standing Matrix in Private Antitrust Enforcement:: a Reconciliation of Economic and Justice Approaches

Popis výsledku anglicky

Any scheme for private antitrust enforcement is framed by two main questions: who will have standing - direct or indirect purchasers - and will the passing-on defense be allowed. Imagine that a cartel of oil producers forces gas stations - direct purchasers - to buy petrol at a higher than competitive price. The gas stations then raise the price for the final customers - indirect purchasers. When the gas stations sue the cartel, the cartelist will claim that no damage has occurred to the gas stations, because the gas stations have passed on the overcharge to its final customers - the passing-on defense. In the United States, the ruling of the California Supreme Court in Clayworth v. Pfizer, alongside a report of the Antitrust Modernization Commission of 2007, spurred new debate on whether the 1970s Federal case law should be overruled. The situation in the European Union has been even more challenging. The Court of Justice of the EU surprised everybody with two landmark cases in the ea

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

EUI Working Papers MWP

ISSN

1830-7728

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2013

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

30

Stát vydavatele periodika

IT - Italská republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

1-22

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—