TTIP and ISDS: not irreconcilable acronyms

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F15%3A10316989" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/15:10316989 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.rozkotova.com/ebooks/cyil2015/index.html#359" target="_blank" >http://www.rozkotova.com/ebooks/cyil2015/index.html#359</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

TTIP and ISDS: not irreconcilable acronyms

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This contribution focuses on a highly controversial issue of recent times - the inclusion of investment protection provisions, including investor-state arbitration (ISDS), in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), currently being negotiated between the European Union and the United States. The whole agreement and, in particular, an investment chapter have become an object of the heated public debate on the side of EU, and the negotiator, the European Commission, has to deal with increasing pressure from the public, EU institutions and the Member States. Under these circumstances, the European Commission is preparing substantial reform proposals in the area of investment protection, e.g. introduction of an appellate mechanism, to placate critics and save the investment chapter, including ISDS in the TTIP. This paper briefly examines the current state of the public debate about investment protection in the EU and puts theTTIP in a broader context of the reform of the

Název v anglickém jazyce

TTIP and ISDS: not irreconcilable acronyms

Popis výsledku anglicky

This contribution focuses on a highly controversial issue of recent times - the inclusion of investment protection provisions, including investor-state arbitration (ISDS), in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), currently being negotiated between the European Union and the United States. The whole agreement and, in particular, an investment chapter have become an object of the heated public debate on the side of EU, and the negotiator, the European Commission, has to deal with increasing pressure from the public, EU institutions and the Member States. Under these circumstances, the European Commission is preparing substantial reform proposals in the area of investment protection, e.g. introduction of an appellate mechanism, to placate critics and save the investment chapter, including ISDS in the TTIP. This paper briefly examines the current state of the public debate about investment protection in the EU and puts theTTIP in a broader context of the reform of the

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, česká ročenka mezinárodního práva veřejného a soukromého

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2015

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

345-356

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84958255451