Implementing the Nuremberg Principles in National Trial with Nazi Criminals: Hesitation versus Enthusiasm towards Meeting the Standards of Complementarity in the Modern International Criminal Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10328002" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10328002 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004323667_012" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004323667_012</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004323667_012" target="_blank" >10.1163/9789004323667_012</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Implementing the Nuremberg Principles in National Trial with Nazi Criminals: Hesitation versus Enthusiasm towards Meeting the Standards of Complementarity in the Modern International Criminal Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The ICC task is not only to actually carry out hearings in criminal cases before it, but also to contribute to the harmonization of the approaches of individual states to the international criminal law (at least for the states party to the Rome Statute). The comments made in this article are intended to provide historical perspective on some possible loopholes in case a state prefers to use standard and purely domestic legislation for prosecuting large-scale crimes. Such national approach is not perse inconsistent with the ICC Statute, but in practice may give rise to rather dubious outcomes as we have witnessed throughout the post-ww ii history.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Implementing the Nuremberg Principles in National Trial with Nazi Criminals: Hesitation versus Enthusiasm towards Meeting the Standards of Complementarity in the Modern International Criminal Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

The ICC task is not only to actually carry out hearings in criminal cases before it, but also to contribute to the harmonization of the approaches of individual states to the international criminal law (at least for the states party to the Rome Statute). The comments made in this article are intended to provide historical perspective on some possible loopholes in case a state prefers to use standard and purely domestic legislation for prosecuting large-scale crimes. Such national approach is not perse inconsistent with the ICC Statute, but in practice may give rise to rather dubious outcomes as we have witnessed throughout the post-ww ii history.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Prosecuting International Crimes: A Multidisciplinary Approach

ISBN

978-90-04-31740-6

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

227-254

Počet stran knihy

313

Název nakladatele

Brill Nijhoff

Místo vydání

Leiden

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—