The International Criminal Court and Human Rights: Achievements and Challenges

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F16%3A33163036" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/16:33163036 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The International Criminal Court and Human Rights: Achievements and Challenges

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The chapter deals with application and interpretation of human rights before the International Criminal Court (ICC). In the first part, the chapter analyzes existing jurisprudence concerning interpretation of Article 21(3) of the Rome Statute of the ICC, which is the primary interpretative guidance embracing the Statute and other sources applicable before the ICC. The chapter evaluates position of non-binding documents, usage of regional human rights treaties and describes functions human rights have been granted before the ICC. In its second part, the chapter puts forward challenges dealing with application and interpretation of human rights before the ICC. Non-refoulement principle is used as an example that not every human right is transferable to the ICC, which is an international organization. The text further focuses on question, whether the ICC can exceed limits of existing human rights jurisprudence and extend the scope of human rights protection. The chapter reveals the ICC's tendency to dissociate from violation of human rights at domestic level attributable to a state and briefly evaluates, how is this approach compatible with general principles in area of responsibility of international organizations for internationally wrongful acts and concept of due diligence in international law.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The International Criminal Court and Human Rights: Achievements and Challenges

Popis výsledku anglicky

The chapter deals with application and interpretation of human rights before the International Criminal Court (ICC). In the first part, the chapter analyzes existing jurisprudence concerning interpretation of Article 21(3) of the Rome Statute of the ICC, which is the primary interpretative guidance embracing the Statute and other sources applicable before the ICC. The chapter evaluates position of non-binding documents, usage of regional human rights treaties and describes functions human rights have been granted before the ICC. In its second part, the chapter puts forward challenges dealing with application and interpretation of human rights before the ICC. Non-refoulement principle is used as an example that not every human right is transferable to the ICC, which is an international organization. The text further focuses on question, whether the ICC can exceed limits of existing human rights jurisprudence and extend the scope of human rights protection. The chapter reveals the ICC's tendency to dissociate from violation of human rights at domestic level attributable to a state and briefly evaluates, how is this approach compatible with general principles in area of responsibility of international organizations for internationally wrongful acts and concept of due diligence in international law.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Towards a Universal Justice? Putting International Court and Jurisdictions into Perspective

ISBN

978-90-04-29870-5

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

206-221

Počet stran knihy

571

Název nakladatele

Brill Academic Publishers

Místo vydání

Leiden

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—